Digital Economy and Skills Wage Gap: An Empirical Study with CFPS Data

Authors

  • HAN Lei Business School, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan 411105, China
  • TIAN Zhiminhui Business School, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan 411105, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20069/yp0n6m15

Keywords:

digital economy, skill wage gap, employment creation effect, post promotion effect, time investment effect, income distribution

Abstract

With the development of digital technology leading the new round of technological revolution and industrial upgrading, the digital economy is bound to have a significant impact on the employment and income distribution pattern in China, causing the skill wage gap to present new features. Exploring the effect of the digital economy on the skill wage gap and the role mechanism behind it is instructive on how to achieve common wealth through the digital economy and then realize Chinese-style modernization. The current academic community has not yet formed a unified perception of the measurement of the digital economy, and most of the research focuses on the impact of technological progress, artificial intelligence, etc., on the skills wage gap, and the impact of digital financial inclusion, artificial intelligence, etc., on inclusive growth and high-quality employment, etc., but very few literatures have directly investigated the impact of the development of the digital economy on the pattern of income of micro-individuals with different human capitals.

This paper assesses the impact of the digital economy on the skill wage gap at the industry level. The results show that the digital economy significantly increases the wage income of low-skilled laborers. Quantile regression and O-B decomposition find that the digital economy narrows the low- and middle-income gaps within low-skilled and high-skilled groups, and has a higher explanatory effect on the skill wage gap at the low and middle quartiles of the wage distribution. The analysis of the mechanism of action shows that the digital economy can provide more employment opportunities and jobs for workers, increase the degree of time commitment, and improve the income inequality between high and low-skilled workers, but the digital economy cannot promote the promotion of workers’ positions, which is not conducive to the improvement of the level of human capital, and there is a risk of exacerbating the phenomenon of polarization of the employment skill structure. From the analysis of heterogeneity, the impact of the digital economy on workers’ wages and incomes is heterogeneous across different employment sectors and different social capital groups. As a result, it is proposed that the government should continue to vigorously develop the digital economy, actively explore the path of regulating and moderating high incomes in the context of the digital economy, improve the labor rights and benefits protection system for low-skilled groups, and strengthen the learning society, among other policy recommendations.

Compared with the existing literature, the marginal contribution of this paper may be reflected in three aspects: first, this paper measures the digital economy of each industry from three perspectives: digital infrastructure, digital use and digital benefits, and measures a comprehensive digital economy indicator using the entropy method, which enriches the literature in terms of the factors influencing the skills wage gap. Second, this paper analyzes the impact of the digital economy on the skills wage gap among various labor groups from different dimensions, enriching the conclusions and making the policy recommendations more targeted. Third, this paper explores the role mechanism of the digital economy in terms of its employment creation effect, job promotion effect and time investment effect, in which the employment creation effect and time investment effect are confirmed, but the job promotion effect is difficult to give full play to, which is not conducive to the improvement of the level of human capital, and there is a risk of exacerbating the phenomenon of polarization of employment, and the conclusions of the study provide a basis for the future of how China can further do a good job in talent. The conclusion of the study plays a certain revelation for how to further do a good job of attracting talents and improving the labor protection system in China in the future.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] 邱泽奇, 张樹沁, 刘世定, 等. (2016). 从数字鸿沟到红利差异: 互联网资本的视角. 中国社会科学, (10), 93-115.

[2] 李雅楠, 谢倩芸. (2017). 互联网使用与工资收入差距: 基于CHNS数据的经验分析. 经济理论与经济管理, (7), 87-100.

[3] 吴彬彬, 沈扬扬, 卢云鹤, 等. (2021). 互联网使用与用途如何影响农村居民工资性收入差距. 劳动经济研究, (4), 99-116.

[4] 杨艳琳, 付晨玉. (2019). 中国农村普惠金融发展对农村劳动年龄人口多维贫困的改善效应分析. 中国农村经济, (3), 19-35.

[5] 毛宇飞, 曾湘泉, 胡文馨. (2018). 互联网使用能否减小性别工资差距: 基于CFPS数据的经验分析. 财经研究, (7), 33-45.

[6] Pedulla, D. S., & Pager, D. (2019). Race and networks in the job search process. American Sociological Review, 84(6), 983-1012.

[7] Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2019). Automation and new tasks: How technology displaces and reinstates labor. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 33(2), 3-30.

[8] 杨飞, 范从来. (2022). 产业智能化是否有利于中国益贫式发展? 经济研究, (5), 150-165.

[9] 张勋, 万广华, 张佳佳, 等. (2019). 数字经济、普惠金融与包容性增长. 经济研究, (8), 71-86.

[10] 唐红梅, 赵军. (2022). 数字普惠金融、产业结构与包容性增长. 当代经济科学, (6), 71-83.

[11] 李帅娜. (2021). 数字化与服务业工资差距: 推波助澜还是雪中送炭: 基于CFPS与行业匹配数据的分析. 产业经济研究, (6), 1-14.

[12] Phelps, E. S. (1972). The statistical theory of racism and sexism. American Economic Review, 62(4), 659-661.

[13] 胡拥军, 关乐宁. (2022). 数字经济的就业创造效应与就业替代效应探究. 改革, (4), 42-54.

[14] 马克思. (1975). 资本论: 第一卷. 北京: 人民出版社, 468-469.

[15] Borland, J., & Coelli, M. (2017). Are robots taking our jobs? Australian Economic Review, 50(4), 377-397.

[16] 格雷, 苏里. (2020). 销声匿迹: 数字化工作的真正未来 (左安浦, 译). 上海: 上海人民出版社, 28.

[17] 蔡跃洲, 陈楠. (2019). 新技术革命下人工智能与高质量增长、高质量就业. 数量经济技术经济研究, (5), 3-22.

[18] 潘旦. (2022). 互联网“零工经济”就业群体的劳动权益保障研究. 浙江社会科学, (4), 89-95.

[19] Putnam, L. L., Myers, K. K., & Gailliard, B. M. (2014). Examining the tensions in workplace flexibility and exploring options for new directions. Human Relations, 67(4), 413-440.

[20] 李海舰, 李凌霄. (2022). 中国“共享员工”劳动用工模式研究. 中国工业经济, (11), 116-134.

[21] 卢晶亮. (2017). 资本积累与技能工资差距: 来自中国的经验证据. 经济学(季刊), (2), 577-598.

[22] Firpo, S., Fortin, N. M., & Lemieux, T. (2009). Unconditional quantile regressions. Econometrica, 77(3), 953-973.

[23] 刘军, 杨渊鋆, 张三峰. (2020). 中国数字经济测度与驱动因素研究. 上海经济研究, (6), 81-96.

[24] 柏培文, 张云. (2021). 数字经济、人口红利下降与中低技能劳动者权益. 经济研究, (5), 91-108.

[25] 赵涛, 张智, 梁上坤. (2020). 数字经济、创业活跃度与高质量发展: 来自中国城市的经验证据. 管理世界, (10), 65-76.

[26] Nunn, N., & Qian, N. (2014). US food aid and civil conflict. American Economic Review, 104(6), 1630-1666.

[27] Lewbel, A. (1997). Constructing instruments for regressions with measurement error when no additional data are available, with an application to patents and R&D. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 65(5), 1201-1213.

[28] 李唐, 李青, 陈楚霞. (2020). 数据管理能力对企业生产率的影响效应: 来自中国企业—劳动力匹配调查的新发现. 中国工业经济, (6), 174-192.

[29] Autor, D. H., & Dorn, D. (2013). The growth of low-skill service jobs and the polarization of the US labor market. American Economic Review, 103(5), 1553-1597.

[30] 马光荣, 杨恩艳. (2011). 社会网络、非正规金融与创业. 经济研究, (3), 83-94.

Downloads

Published

2024-05-16

How to Cite

Digital Economy and Skills Wage Gap: An Empirical Study with CFPS Data. (2024). Modern Economic Science, 46(2), 75-89. https://doi.org/10.20069/yp0n6m15

Similar Articles

11-20 of 53

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.