Impact of Capital Market Opening on Systemic Financial Risks: An Empirical Study Based on Transnational Panel Data

Authors

  • PENG Hongfeng School of Finance, Shandong University of Finance and Economics, Jinan 250014, China
  • ZHANG Rongjing School of Economics, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20069/j5cg2f69

Keywords:

capital market liberalization, financial stability, systemic financial risk, financial development, openness maturity

Abstract

The 20th CPC National Congress emphasized the importance of adopting a proactive strategy for opening up, aiming to establish a broader, more extensive, and deeper pattern of international engagement. This strategy necessitates enhancing the synergistic effects between domestic and international markets and resources through steady institutional openness. However, the opening of capital markets is accompanied by frequent cross-border capital flows, risking imbalances and increased volatility in local markets. Understanding the risk evolution under such openness can empower China to advance its initiatives from a stronger position, safeguard against systemic financial risks, and ultimately achieve high-quality economic development.

Using data from 38 countries from 2004 to 2019, this paper empirically analyzes the static and dynamic impacts of capital market liberalization, including both inflows and outflows, on systemic financial risks in open countries. The analysis uses the capital market opening index from the GKAOPEN database. The findings indicate that overall capital market opening significantly heightens systemic financial risks. A detailed analysis reveals asymmetrical effects: the opening of capital inflows intensifies financial volatility and increases the likelihood of financial crises. The impact of opening to capital outflows on financial stability varies, depending on the balance between economic gains from compliant investments and the risks associated with capital flight, making the overall influence on financial risk less clear. Even after robustness tests using financial crises and comprehensive financial risk as substitutes for measuring systemic financial risks and controlling for potential endogenous problems, the conclusions remain consistent. Further analysis shows that the impact of capital market opening on systemic financial risk exhibits significant time-varying characteristics. Excessive capital inflows pose a notable risk to open countries.

This paper expands in two key aspects. First, compared to previous literature, such as quasi-natural experiments related to the “Shanghai-Hong Kong Stock Connect” and “Shenzhen-Hong Kong Stock Connect”, it offers novel insights by leveraging continuous time variables from the GKAOPEN database to comprehensively evaluate the impact of various opening-up policies and subdivide the opening direction. Second, recognizing the dynamic nature of opening, this paper goes beyond analyzing the aggregate static impact of opening on risks by empirically focusing on the dynamic influence of capital market opening on financial risk.

Drawing from international experiences of transitioning from emerging to mature markets, capital market opening is crucial for promoting value investment. It encourages competition among financial institutions, supporting high-quality development in the capital market. However, it may also accelerate the cross-border transmission and linkage of risks, leading to increased shared risk exposure between domestic and international markets and concentrating substantial risks in the financial and economic sectors of open countries. Understanding the dynamic evolution of risks during the opening process helps regulatory authorities improve systemic risk monitoring, enhance macro-prudential supervision, and balance development and security in opening up, thereby preventing systemic financial risks.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Henry P. B. Capital account liberalization: theory, evidence, and speculation [J]. Journal of Economic Literature, 2007, 45(4):887-935.

[2] Gehringer A. Growth productivity and capital accumulation: the effects of financial liberalization in the case of European integration [J]. International Review of Economics and Finance, 2013, 25:291-309.

[3] 钟凯, 孙昌玲, 王永妍, 等. 资本市场对外开放与股价异质性波动: 来自“沪港通”的经验证据 [J]. 金融研究, 2018(7):174-192.

[4] Anz C., Chen C., Li D., et al. Foreign institutional ownership and the speed of leverage adjustment: international evidence [J]. Journal of Corporate Finance, 2021, 68:101966.

[5] Edison H. J., Levine R., Ricci L., et al. International financial integration and economic growth [J]. Journal of International Money and Finance, 2002, 21(6):749-776.

[6] Moshirian F., Tian X., Zhang B., et al. Stock market liberalization and innovation [J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2021, 139(3):985-1014.

[7] Jeanne O., Korinek A. Excessive volatility in capital flows: a Pigouvian taxation approach [J]. American Economic Review, 2010, 100(2):403-407.

[8] 王鹏, 吴金宴. 基于协高阶矩视角的沪港股市风险传染分析 [J]. 管理科学学报, 2018(6):29-42.

[9] 谭小芬, 童临风. 资本管制的理论依据与实践选择 [J]. 当代经济科学, 2024(1):30-44.

[10] 谢贤君, 郁俊莉. 跨境资本流动与商业银行系统性风险 [J]. 当代经济科学, 2024(1):1-15.

[11] 谭小芬, 虞梦微. 全球金融周期与跨境资本流动 [J]. 金融研究, 2021(10):22-39.

[12] 方意, 荆中博. 外部冲击下系统性金融风险的生成机制 [J]. 管理世界, 2022(5):19-35.

[13] 毛海欧, 刘海云. 中国OFDI如何影响出口技术含量: 基于世界投入产出数据的研究 [J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2018(7):97-113.

[14] 卞雨晨, 高水文. 跨境资本流动与企业投融资期限错配: 兼论宏观审慎政策与资本管制措施的作用 [J]. 世界经济研究, 2023(8):119-134.

[15] 顾海峰, 卞雨晨. 跨境资本流动、贷款集中与银行系统性风险: 如何理解宏观审慎政策和国际金融环境的作用? [J]. 世界经济研究, 2021(10):39-54.

[16] 金成晓, 李岩松, 姜旭. 跨境资本流动、宏观审慎管理与金融稳定 [J]. 世界经济研究, 2020(3):46-59.

[17] 彭红枫, 祝小全. 短期资本流动的多重动机和冲击: 基于TVP-VAR模型的动态分析 [J]. 经济研究, 2019(8):36-52.

[18] 杨科, 郭亚飞, 田凤平. 经济政策不确定性冲击下全球系统性金融风险的跨市场传染: 基于TVP-FAVAR和TVP-VAR模型的研究 [J]. 统计研究, 2023(7):70-84.

[19] 邓敏, 蓝发钦. 金融开放条件的成熟度评估: 基于综合效益的门槛模型分析 [J]. 经济研究, 2013(12):120-133.

[20] 彭红枫, 尹智超, 肖祖沔, 等. 全球资本管制的动态变化: 基于GKAOPEN资本账户开放指标体系的分析 [J]. 国际金融研究, 2022(11):3-18.

[21] 占韦威, 裴平. 全球金融周期对国际资本异常流动的影响 [J]. 国际金融研究, 2023(7):61-72.

[22] 李增福, 陈俊杰, 连玉君, 等. 经济政策不确定性与企业短债长用 [J]. 管理世界, 2022(1):77-89.

[23] Beverelli C., Fiorini M., Hoekman B. Services trade policy and manufacturing productivity: the role of institutions [J]. Journal of International Economics, 2017, 104:166-182.

[24] 荆中博, 胡佳楠, 方意. 宏观金融波动与中国银行业系统性风险: 金融周期视角 [J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2023(7):1940-1959.

[25] 陶玲, 朱迎. 系统性金融风险的监测和度量: 基于中国金融体系的研究 [J]. 金融研究, 2016(6):18-36.

[26] Reinhart C. M., Rogoff K. S. This time is different: a panoramic view of eight centuries of financial crises [R]. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper, 2008.

[27] Sahay M. R., Cihak M., N’Diaye M. P., et al. Financial inclusion: can it meet multiple macroeconomic goals? [M]. International Monetary Fund, 2015:24-25.

[28] Jordà Ò. Estimation and inference of impulse responses by local projections [J]. American Economic Review, 2005, 95(1):161-182.

Downloads

Published

2024-10-29

How to Cite

Impact of Capital Market Opening on Systemic Financial Risks: An Empirical Study Based on Transnational Panel Data. (2024). Modern Economic Science, 46(4), 27-40. https://doi.org/10.20069/j5cg2f69

Similar Articles

1-10 of 55

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.