Housing Price Fluctuations, Household Debt Risk, and Wealth Distribution: A Discussion on Housing Property Tax and Housing Subsidy Reform

Authors

  • MENG Xianchun Center for Quantitative Economics, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20069/dbgkjp44

Keywords:

housing price fluctuations, household leverage ratio, household wealth distribution, housing property tax, housing subsidy

Abstract

With the robust development of the real estate market, mortgage loans and housing have emerged as the primary components of Chinese household debt and wealth, respectively. Consequently, fluctuations in housing prices have become critical factors influencing household debt risk and wealth distribution. Since 2021, the real estate market has encountered considerable risks. Therefore, how can we design a reform strategy for real estate that promotes the equalization of household housing wealth while mitigating the risks associated with declining housing prices? This is a crucial challenge that must be addressed in the effort to establish a long-term, stable operational mechanism for the real estate market.

This paper employs a Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium (DSGE) model with heterogeneous households to explain how fluctuations in housing prices impact household debt risk and wealth distribution. It also seeks to suggest policy measures aimed at reducing household debt risks and improving wealth distribution. Research shows that low-wealth families, constrained by housing loans, can only benefit minimally from increases in housing prices, while they suffer the full brunt of wealth losses when prices fall. As a result, fluctuations in housing prices can lead to either slight gains or significant losses in the net value of properties owned by low-wealth families, which in turn heightens household debt risk and exacerbates wealth inequality. The results of policy simulations reveal that a standalone housing property tax may depress housing prices, resulting in greater wealth losses for low-wealth families and further widening the wealth gap among households. Conversely, a combination of housing property taxes and housing subsidies for low-wealth families can effectively reduce household debt risk and improve wealth distribution. Specifically, compared to a fixed housing subsidy rate, a policy model that adjusts the housing subsidy rate inversely—by focusing on housing area purchased by low-wealth families and maintaining a low frequency of adjustments—proves to be more effective in stabilizing the real estate market and reducing welfare losses.

This paper contributes to the existing literature in two significant ways. First, unlike previous research that mainly focus on the macroeconomic impacts of rising housing prices, we clarify the mechanisms behind household debt risk and housing wealth inequality under two scenarios: rising and falling housing prices. Second, current research often looks at the prevention of household debt risks and the improvement of household wealth distribution as distinct topics. In contrast, this paper proposes a holistic strategy that combines housing property taxes and housing subsidies to simultaneously reduce household debt risks and foster a fairer distribution of housing wealth among households.

This paper provides theoretical insights for a comprehensive understanding of the debt risks and wealth distribution effects related to fluctuations in housing prices. Additionally, it offers policy recommendations for establishing a long-term mechanism in the real estate market that simultaneously mitigates household debt risks and promotes an equitable distribution of housing wealth.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] 习近平. 扎实推动共同富裕[J]. 求是, 2021(20):4-8.

[2] 况伟大, 朱勇, 刘江涛. 房产税对房价的影响: 来自OECD国家的证据[J]. 财贸经济, 2012(5):121-129.

[3] 刘建丰, 于雪, 彭俞超, 等. 房产税对宏观经济的影响效应研究[J]. 金融研究, 2020(8):34-53.

[4] 李博, 王霄. 房产税改革的经济与福利效应: 基于异质性个体模型的研究[J]. 世界经济, 2023(5):90-118.

[5] Iacoviello M. House prices, borrowing constraints, and monetary policy in the business cycle[J]. The American Economic Review, 2005, 95(3):739-764.

[6] 周广肃, 王雅琦. 住房价格、房屋购买与中国家庭杠杆率[J]. 金融研究, 2019(6):1-19.

[7] 孟宪春, 张屹山. 家庭债务、房地产价格渠道与中国经济波动[J]. 经济研究, 2021(5):75-90.

[8] Aiyagari S.R. Uninsured idiosyncratic risk and aggregate saving[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1994, 109(3):659-684.

[9] Bewley T. The permanent income hypothesis: a theoretical formulation[J]. Journal of Economic Theory, 1977, 16(2):252-292.

[10] Huggett M. Wealth distribution in life-cycle economies[J]. Journal of Monetary Economics, 1996, 38(3):469-494.

[11] Li S, Wan H. Evolution of wealth inequality in China[J]. China Economic Journal, 2015, 8(3):264-287.

[12] Wang H, Wang C, Wu Y. What drove housing wealth inequality in China[J]. China & World Economy, 2021, 29(1):32-60.

[13] 岳希明, 英成金. 我国家庭住房财富不平等变化(1995—2018年)[J]. 南开经济研究, 2022(12):97-116.

[14] 陈彦斌, 邱哲圣. 高房价如何影响居民储蓄率和财产不平等[J]. 经济研究, 2011(10):25-38.

[15] 原鹏飞, 冯蕾. 经济增长、收入分配与贫富分化: 基于DCGE模型的房地产价格上涨效应研究[J]. 经济研究, 2014(9):77-90.

[16] 孟宪春. 房价对家庭债务和财富分布的影响: 理论机制与应对策略[J]. 经济研究, 2023(4):171-189.

[17] Mian A, Rao K, Sufi A. Household balance sheets, consumption, and the economic slump[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2013, 128(4):1687-1726.

[18] Alpanda S, Zubairy S. Addressing household indebtedness: monetary, fiscal or macroprudential policy?[J]. European Economic Review, 2017, 92:47-73.

[19] 马草原, 李宇淼. 宏观审慎政策工具LTV调控房地产市场的有效性分析[J]. 南开经济研究, 2020(6):122-141.

[20] 马理, 范伟. 促进“房住不炒”的货币政策与宏观审慎“双支柱”调控研究[J]. 中国工业经济, 2021(3):5-23.

[21] 周闯, 潘敏. 房产税改革、经济增长与金融稳定[J]. 财贸经济, 2021(11):20-35.

[22] 杨耀武, 刘元生. 房地产税的宏观经济效应与分配效应研究[J]. 经济研究, 2023(5):41-59.

[23] 张平, 侯一麟, 任强, 等. 房地产税与财政治理: 对八个问题的回答[J]. 国际经济评论, 2023(1):53-71.

[24] 邓翔, 何瑞宏. 房产税改革、宏观审慎政策与房地产市场长效机制[J]. 当代经济科学, 2023(4):29-44.

[25] Rubio M, Carrasco-Gallego J.A. Macroprudential and monetary policies: implications for financial stability and welfare[J]. Journal of Banking & Finance, 2014, 49(C):326-336.

[26] Kaplan G, Mitman K, Violante G.L. The housing boom and bust: model meets evidence[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 2020, 128(9):3285-3345.

[27] Bernanke B.S, Gertler M, Gilchrist S. The financial accelerator in a quantitative business cycle framework[J]. Handbook of Macroeconomics, 1999, 1:1341-1393.

[28] Calvo G.A. Staggered prices in a utility-maximizing framework[J]. Journal of Monetary Economics, 1983, 12(3):383-398.

Downloads

Published

2025-01-13

How to Cite

Housing Price Fluctuations, Household Debt Risk, and Wealth Distribution: A Discussion on Housing Property Tax and Housing Subsidy Reform. (2025). Modern Economic Science, 47(1), 17-29. https://doi.org/10.20069/dbgkjp44

Similar Articles

11-20 of 32

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.