How does the Digital Economy Affect Inter-city Labor Market Segmentation: “Deepen Divides” or “Bridge Gaps”?

Authors

  • CUI Linhao School of Economics, University of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing 102488, China
  • FENG Feng Institute of Quantitative and Technical Economics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing 100732, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20069/41syg490

Keywords:

digital economy, labor market segmentation, unified national market construction, labor mobility, industrial agglomeration, urban innovation

Abstract

The digital economy’s rapid expansion is fundamentally transforming contemporary life, presenting both challenges and opportunities for labor market segmentation. While digital technologies have dismantled geographical and informational barriers, enhanced skill matching, strengthened labor protections, and reduced the social and temporal costs of workforce mobility, they simultaneously demand higher skill levels from workers. Whether the digital economy ultimately serves to “deepen divides” or “bridge gaps” in inter-city labor markets remains an empirical question requiring thorough investigation. Notably, there exists a significant research gap regarding the digital economy’s impact on labor market segmentation at the city level.

This study utilizes panel data from 270 Chinese cities spanning the years 2011 to 2019, employing price methodology and entropy weight techniques to quantify urban labor market segmentation and digital economic development. We propose two primary mechanisms through which the digital economy influences labor market segmentation: by reducing mobility costs and enhancing income opportunities for mobile workers. Our findings demonstrate that digital economic development significantly mitigates inter-city labor market segmentation, primarily by optimizing market matching efficiency, thereby reducing mobility costs and improving the benefits of labor flow. Heterogeneity analysis reveals that the digital economy’s contribution to a unified labor market is particularly pronounced in breaking down barriers to labor mobility in inland remote areas and economically disadvantaged cities. Further analysis indicates that enhanced industrial agglomeration and urban innovation facilitate the digital economy’s capacity to bridge gaps in the labor market.

Our research highlights several critical policy implications. First, policymakers should promote deeper integration between the digital economy and labor markets to overcome segmentation by developing digital job-matching platforms, enhancing workers’ digital capabilities, and ensuring equitable access to digital infrastructure across regions. Second, strengthening labor protections and skill development initiatives under the digital economy framework is essential, alongside establishing an open and inclusive labor market policy system that provides comprehensive social protection and public services for migrant workers. Finally, fostering industrial agglomeration and urban innovation is crucial for maximizing the digital economy’s benefits, as cities with robust industrial foundations and innovative capacities are better positioned to leverage digital technologies for improved labor market efficiency and reduced segmentation. Implementation of these policies would enable city governments to harness the digital economy’s dividends, creating more unified and dynamic labor markets that contribute to sustainable economic growth and social equity.

This paper makes three primary contributions to existing literature: First, it advances research on the digital economy’s impact on unified national markets to the factor and city levels, aligning with current national market unification objectives. Second, it employs the price method to measure inter-city labor market segmentation in China, combining meso- and micro-level databases for a scientifically rigorous and data-rich analysis. Third, it offers practical recommendations from both supply and demand perspectives on utilizing the digital economy to overcome inter-city labor market divisions, facilitate cross-regional factor mobility, and build a unified national market.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] 张晨, 马彪, 仇焕广. 信息通信技术使用可以促进易地扶贫搬迁户的社会融入吗? [J]. 中国农村经济, 2022(2):56-75.

[2] 尹志超, 仇化. “数智”还是“数滞”: 数字化转型与非农就业 [J]. 经济学动态, 2024(2):32-51.

[3] 于新亮, 张文瑞, 郭文光, 等. 养老保险制度统一与劳动要素市场化配置: 基于公私部门养老金并轨改革的实证研究 [J]. 中国工业经济, 2021(1):36-55.

[4] Spilermans. Carers, labor market structure, and socioeconomic achievement [J]. American Journal of Sociology, 1977, 83(3):551-593.

[5] 吴愈晓. 劳动力市场分割、职业流动与城市劳动者经济地位获得的二元路径模式 [J]. 中国社会科学, 2011(1):119-137.

[6] 马草原, 马文涛, 李成. 中国劳动力市场所有制分割的根源与表现 [J]. 管理世界, 2017(11):22-34.

[7] 周正柱, 周鹃. 劳动力市场分割的经济效应: 研究综述与展望 [J]. 劳动经济研究, 2022(2):121-139.

[8] Cefalor, Scandurra R, Kazepov Y. Youth labor market integration in European regions [J]. Sustainability, 2020, 12(9):3813.

[9] 刘斐然, 胡立君, 石军伟. 区域经济差距、短期目标导向与市场分割 [J]. 当代经济科学, 2021(4):119-130.

[10] Chos, Choi Y. Convergent or divergent? The hidden dynamics of institutional changes in the labor markets and social welfare systems in South Korea and Japan [J]. Politics & Policy, 2017, 45:594-625.

[11] 刘劭睿, 李钏, 樊佳琪. 中国劳动力市场分割的时空演化研究 [J]. 人口学刊, 2021(6):14-27.

[12] 苑德宇, 常家铭, 张亦然. 迈向劳动力统一大市场: 对中国劳动力市场分割的测度与分析 [J]. 中国经济问题, 2023(3):33-47.

[13] Piketty T. Capital in the Twenty-First Century [M]. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2014:39-55.

[14] 张杰, 王文凯. 方言多样化和企业创新: 中国的事实及机制 [J]. 金融研究, 2022(3):135-151.

[15] 洪银兴, 任保平. 论数字经济与社会主义市场经济的深度融合 [J]. 中国工业经济, 2024(5):5-19.

[16] 周世军, 陈博文. 数字经济是否影响劳动力空间配置: 基于中国流动人口的微观证据 [J]. 云南财经大学学报, 2023(2):96-110.

[17] 李钺霆, 高煜, 何苗. 数字经济有利于提升“专精特新”中小企业培育成效吗? [J]. 软科学, 2024(4):15-21.

[18] Vitaric, Raguseo E. Big data analytics business value and firm performance: Linking with environmental context [J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2019, 58(18):5456-5476.

[19] 王若男, 张广胜. 数字经济与农业转移人口就业质量: 促进或抑制 [J]. 农业技术经济, 2024(2):109-127.

[20] 夏添, 周建华, 孙久文. 数字经济发展、政府介入与城市经济韧性 [J]. 中国软科学, 2024(5):111-121.

[21] 张顺, 吕风光. 企业数字化对劳动力市场就业风险的影响 [J]. 当代经济科学, 2024(4):14-26.

[22] 杨昕, 赵守国. 数字经济赋能劳动生产率的收敛效应: 基于人口红利转变的视角 [J]. 中国人口科学, 2023(2):3-18.

[23] 赵涛, 张智, 梁上坤. 数字经济、创业活跃度与高质量发展: 来自中国城市的经验证据 [J]. 管理世界, 2020(10):65-76.

[24] 郭峰, 王靖一, 王芳, 等. 测度中国数字普惠金融发展: 指数编制与空间特征 [J]. 经济学(季刊), 2020(4):1401-1418.

[25] 陆铭, 陈钊. 分割市场的经济增长: 为什么经济开放可能加剧地方保护? [J]. 经济研究, 2009(3):42-52.

[26] 柏培文, 喻理. 数字经济发展与企业价格加成: 理论机制与经验事实 [J]. 中国工业经济, 2021(11):59-77.

[27] Tombet, Zhu X. Trade, migration, and productivity: A quantitative analysis of China [J]. The American Economic Review, 2019, 109(5):1843-1872.

[28] 黄文彬, 王曦. 流动成本与城市间劳动力配置效率 [J]. 南方经济, 2020(3):24-39.

[29] 郝凤霞, 江文槿, 楼永. 劳动力流动与地区制造业升级: 基于转移升级和转型升级角度 [J]. 产经评论, 2021(6):90-109.

[30] 柳毅, 赵轩, 毛峰. 数字经济驱动共同富裕的发展动力与空间溢出效应研究: 基于长三角面板数据和空间杜宾模型 [J]. 中国软科学, 2023(4):98-108.

Downloads

Published

2025-04-01

How to Cite

How does the Digital Economy Affect Inter-city Labor Market Segmentation: “Deepen Divides” or “Bridge Gaps”?. (2025). Modern Economic Science, 47(2), 54-65. https://doi.org/10.20069/41syg490

Similar Articles

1-10 of 55

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.