New Quality Productive Forces: Coupling Coordination Analysis of Innovativeness and Productivity

Authors

  • SU Zhendong School of Economics and Management, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China
  • GONG Shuo School of Economics and Management, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China
  • LI Zhuoping School of Economics and Management, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20069/b477ev45

Keywords:

new quality productive forces, innovativeness, productivity, coupling coordination, spatial regional differences

Abstract

Against the backdrop of accelerating global scientific and technological revolution and industrial transformation, new quality productive forces, as an advanced form of productivity led by scientific and technological innovation, has become the core engine driving high-quality economic development and the construction of a modernized industrial system. President Xi Jinping has emphasized that the development of new quality productive forces should break away from traditional growth paths and achieve a leap in productivity capacity levels. Innovativeness and productivity, as the two core systems of new quality productive forces, are closely linked through mutual promotion and joint development. Innovativeness creates new forms of productivity through technological breakthroughs, factor restructuring, and institutional changes, while productivity provides a practical field for innovation through improving labor quality, optimizing labor objects, and iterating labor materials. The coupling coordination level between the two not only reflects the deep reconfiguration of production factors in the new era but also represents a key pathway to achieving total factor productivity advancement.

Based on the panel data of 30 provinces in China from 2009 to 2022, this paper constructs a composite indicator system encompassing innovativeness and productivity, and employs coupling coordination models and spatial econometric methods to draw the following conclusions: 1) The coupling coordination degree of new quality productive forces across provinces in China shows an overall fluctuating upward trend, with significant regional imbalance. 2) Dagum Gini coefficient decomposition reveals that inter-regional differences contribute 63% to the variation in coupling coordination degree of new quality productive forces, constituting the primary source of disparity. 3) The coupling coordination degree of new quality productive forces exhibits positive spatial agglomeration characteristics and is significantly influenced by government intervention, urbanization, financial development, and population density.

Compared with existing literature, this paper achieves breakthroughs in two aspects: First, it constructs an assessment framework for new quality productive forces with clear theoretical boundaries, overcoming the limitations of conceptual hybridization of existing studies by deconstructing the two major systems of innovativeness and productivity. Second, beyond exploring the relationship between innovativeness and productivity, this paper further analyzes their coupling coordination mechanism and comprehensively examines their spatiotemporal evolution, regional differences, and spatial correlation, providing new perspectives and empirical evidence for policy formulation.

This study offers important insights for improving the new quality productive forces system under the new development paradigm. First, focus on enhancing local innovativeness and productivity levels. For innovativeness, emphasis should be placed on supporting key technological breakthroughs and disruptive innovations, especially in frontier fields, to cultivate new economic growth points. For productivity, strengthening skills training, encouraging enterprise innovation, and improving production efficiency and quality are essential. Second, break down regional market segmentation and narrow development gaps. Through deepening market system reforms, reducing trade barriers, and promoting the free flow of resources, technology, and talent. Fiscal transfer payments, tax incentives, and other policies to stimulate the development momentum in less-developed regions and promote sustainable economic development. Third, optimize the spatial layout of new quality productive forces and improve regional spillover mechanisms. A comprehensive analysis of resource endowments and industrial foundations is necessary to clarify regional positioning and form a new pattern of complementary advantages and collaborative development. Regional cooperation should be strengthened to promote efficient resource allocation and spillover mechanisms, facilitating the rapid diffusion and broad application of new quality productive forces.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] 习近平. 发展新质生产力是推动高质量发展的内在要求和重要着力点[J]. 求是, 2024, 67(11):4-8.

XI J P. Developing new quality productive forces is an inherent requirement and important focus for promoting high-quality development[J]. Qiushi, 2024, 67(11):4-8.

[2] 袁瀚坤, 韩民春. 新质生产力赋能对外贸易高质量发展: 理论逻辑与实现路径[J]. 国际贸易, 2024, 43(3):15-21.

YUAN H K, HAN M C. New quality productive forces enabling high-quality development of foreign trade: theoretical logic and realization path[J]. Intertrade, 2024, 43(3):15-21.

[3] 任保平. 生产力现代化转型形成新质生产力的逻辑[J]. 经济研究, 2024, 59(3):12-19.

REN B P. The logic of productivity modernization and transformation to form new quality productive forces[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2024, 59(3):12-19.

[4] 蒋永穆, 乔张媛. 新质生产力: 逻辑、内涵及路径[J]. 社会科学研究, 2024, 46(1):10-18.

JIANG Y M, QIAO Z Y. New quality productivity: logic, connotation and path[J]. Social Science Research, 2024, 46(1):10-18.

[5] 李政, 廖晓东. 发展“新质生产力”的理论、历史和现实“三重”逻辑[J]. 政治经济学评论, 2023, 14(6):146-159.

LI Z, LIAO X D. The theoretical, historical, and realistic “triple” logics of developing “new quality productivity”[J]. China Review of Political Economy, 2023, 14(6):146-159.

[6] 赵峰, 季雷. 新质生产力的科学内涵、构成要素和制度保障机制[J]. 学习与探索, 2024, 46(1):92-101.

ZHAO F, JI L. The scientific connotation, constituent elements, and institutional safeguards mechanisms of new quality productivity[J]. Study & Exploration, 2024, 46(1):92-101.

[7] 任保平, 豆渊博. 新质生产力: 文献综述与研究展望[J]. 经济与管理评论, 2024, 40(3):5-16.

REN B P, DOU Y B. New quality productivity: literature review and research outlook[J]. Review of Economy and Management, 2024, 40(3):5-16.

[8] 王树斌, 侯博文, 李彦昭. 新质生产力要素机制、创新逻辑与路径突破: 基于系统论视角[J]. 当代经济科学, 2025, 47(1):120-133.

WANG S B, HOU B W, LI Y Z. New quality productivity forces element mechanism, innovation logic, and path breakthrough: through the lens of system theory[J]. Modern Economic Science, 2025, 47(1):120-133.

[9] 刘伟. 科学认识与切实发展新质生产力[J]. 经济研究, 2024, 59(3):4-11.

LIU W. Scientific understanding and effective development of new quality productivity forces[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2024, 59(3):4-11.

[10] 石建勋, 徐玲. 加快形成新质生产力的重大战略意义及实现路径研究[J]. 财经问题研究, 2024, 46(1):3-12.

SHI J X, XU L. Major strategic significance and implementation path of accelerating the formation of new quality productivity[J]. Research on Financial and Economic Issues, 2024, 46(1):3-12.

[11] 郭朝先, 陈小艳, 彭莉. 新质生产力助推现代化产业体系建设研究[J]. 西安交通大学学报(社会科学版), 2024, 44(4):1-11.

GUO C X, CHEN X Y, PENG L. Research on promoting modern industrial system construction by new quality productive forces[J]. Journal of Xi’an Jiaotong University (Social Sciences), 2024, 44(4):1-11.

[12] 贾若祥, 王继源, 窦红涛. 以新质生产力推动区域高质量发展[J]. 改革, 2024, 37(3):38-47.

JIA R X, WANG J Y, DOU H T. Promoting high-quality regional development by new quality productive forces[J]. Reform, 2024, 37(3):38-47.

[13] 蔡湘杰, 贺正楚. 新质生产力何以影响全要素生产率: 科技创新效应的机理与检验[J]. 当代经济管理, 2024, 46(5):1-15.

CAI X J, HE Z C. How new quality productive forces affect the total factor productivity: the mechanism and the test of the effect of scientific and technological innovation[J]. Contemporary Economic Management, 2024, 46(5):1-15.

[14] 韩文龙, 张瑞生, 赵峰. 新质生产力水平测算与中国经济增长新动能[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2024, 41(6):5-25.

HAN W L, ZHANG R S, ZHAO F. The measurement of new quality productivity and new driving force of the Chinese economy[J]. Journal of Quantitative & Technological Economics, 2024, 41(6):5-25.

[15] 盖凯程, 晏晨景, 刘璐. 因地制宜发展新质生产力: 区域差异、动态演变与影响因素: 基于生产关系视角[J]. 当代经济科学, 2025, 47(2):1-18.

GAI K C, YAN C J, LIU L. Developing new quality productive forces according to local conditions: regional differences, dynamic evolution, and influencing factors: based on the perspective of production relations[J]. Modern Economic Science, 2025, 47(2):1-18.

[16] 任保平, 程至瑜, 宗景辉. 新质生产力形成中制造业新质化发展水平测度与时空演进[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2024, 41(12):5-24.

REN B P, CHEN Z Y, ZONG J H. Measurement and spatiotemporal evolution of new qualitative development level of manufacturing during the formation of new quality productivity[J]. Journal of Quantitative & Technological Economics, 2024, 41(12):5-24.

[17] 卢江, 郭子昂, 王煜萍. 新质生产力发展水平、区域差异与提升路径[J]. 重庆大学学报(社会科学版), 2024, 30(3):1-17.

LU J, GUO Z A, WANG Y P. Levels of development of new quality productivity, regional differences and paths to enhancement[J]. Journal of Chongqing University (Social Science Edition), 2024, 30(3):1-17.

[18] 晏文隽, 陈辰, 冷奥琳. 数字赋能创新链提升企业科技成果转化效能的机制研究[J]. 西安交通大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 42(4):51-60.

YAN W J, CHEN C, LENG A L. The mechanism of digital technologies empower the innovation chain to improve the enterprises’ efficiency of technological achievements transformation[J]. Journal of Xi’an Jiaotong University (Social Sciences), 2022, 42(4):51-60.

[19] 马克思. 资本论: 第一卷[M]. 中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局, 编译. 北京: 人民出版社, 1986:202.

[20] 董庆前. 中国新质生产力发展水平测度、时空演变及收敛性研究[J]. 中国软科学, 2024, 39(8):178-188.

DONG Q Q. Measurement, spatiotemporal evolution, and convergence research on the development level of China’s new quality productivity[J]. China Soft Science, 2024, 39(8):178-188.

[21] 郝智娟, 文琦, 施琳娜, 等. 黄河流域城市群社会经济与生态环境耦合协调空间网络分析[J]. 经济地理, 2023, 43(12):181-191.

HAO Z J, WEN Q, SHI L N, et al. Spatial network analysis of coupling coordination between social economy and eco-environment in Yellow River Basin urban agglomerations[J]. Economic Geography, 2023, 43(12):181-191.

[22] 陈磊, 杜宝贵. 科技服务业发展与区域科技创新耦合协调度及影响因素研究[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2023, 44(12):51-67.

CHEN L, DU B G. Study on coupling coordination degree and influencing factors between the development of science and technology service industry and regional science and technology innovation[J]. Science of Science and Management of S.&T., 2023, 44(12):51-67.

[23] DAGUM C. A new approach to the decomposition of the Gini income inequality ratio[J]. Empirical Economics, 1997, 22(4):515-531.

[24] 苏振东, 宫硕, 曹景鑫. 中国国内大循环的空间网络结构及其成因识别: 兼论自贸试验区作为动力源畅通内循环网络的重要作用[J]. 工业技术经济, 2023, 42(11):142-152.

SU Z D, GONG S, CAO J X. Spatial network structure of China’s domestic circulation and its cause identification: also on the important role of pilot free trade zones as a power source to smooth the domestic circulation network[J]. Journal of Industrial Technology and Economy, 2023, 42(11):142-152.

[25] 苏振东, 宫硕, 李卓平. 中国省际营商环境空间网络结构分析: 基于自由贸易试验区视角[J]. 大连理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2025, 46(1):26-36.

SU Z D, GONG S, LI Z P. An analysis of the inter-provincial spatial network structure of business environment in China: from the perspective of pilot free trade zones[J]. Journal of Dalian University of Technology (Social Sciences), 2025, 46(1):26-36.

[26] 刘华军, 刘传明, 孙亚男. 中国能源消费的空间关联网络结构特征及其效应研究[J]. 中国工业经济, 2015, 33(5):83-95.

LIU H J, LIU C M, SUN Y N. Spatial correlation network structure of energy consumption and its effect in China[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2015, 33(5):83-95.

[27] 邓世成, 吴玉鸣. 城市群绿色技术创新的空间网络结构特征及其效应研究: 以成渝地区双城经济圈为例[J]. 管理学报, 2022, 19(12):1756-1765.

DENG S C, WU Y M. Research on spatial network structure characteristics and effects of green technology innovation in urban agglomeration: take Chengdu-Chongqing economic circle as an example[J]. Chinese Journal of Management, 2022, 19(12):1756-1765.

[28] 毛晓蒙, 王仁曾. 绿色金融与新质生产力: 促进还是抑制——基于技术创新与环境关注度的视角[J]. 上海财经大学学报, 2024, 26(5):30-45.

MAO X M, WANG R Z. Green finance and new quality productive forces: promotion or inhibition? From the perspectives of technological innovation and environmental concern[J]. Journal of Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, 2024, 26(5):30-45.

[29] 朱波, 曾丽丹. 数字金融发展对区域新质生产力的影响及作用机制[J]. 财经科学, 2024, 68(8):16-31.

ZHU B, ZENG L D. Analysis of the impact and mechanism of digital finance development on regional new quality productive forces[J]. Finance & Economics, 2024, 68(8):16-31.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-21

How to Cite

New Quality Productive Forces: Coupling Coordination Analysis of Innovativeness and Productivity. (2025). Modern Economic Science, 47(3), 95-113. https://doi.org/10.20069/b477ev45

Similar Articles

21-30 of 47

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.