The Impacts of New-round Hukou Reform on Rural-urban Migration: Theoretical Mechanisms and Empirical Evidence

Authors

  • AN Lei School of Economics and Business Administration, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China
  • YAN Weibo School of Public Finance and Taxation, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan 430073, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20069/r4en5d12

Keywords:

Hukou reform, urban-rural migration, migration cost, migration benefits, human capital

Abstract

In economies experiencing continuous growth in the working-age population and a declining dependency ratio, the population structure plays a crucial role in driving rapid economic growth and unlocking a demographic dividend. However, as China’s population ages, the unlimited labor force supply diminishes, resulting in the waning of the demographic dividend. Effectively reallocating the labor force between urban and rural areas is imperative to maximize China’s demographic dividend. Nevertheless, institutional barriers, such as urban-rural labor market segmentation due to the household registration system and disparities in public service accessibility, hinder the free allocation of labor resources between these areas. Against this backdrop, this study investigates the impact of the new-round Hukou reform on labor force reallocation, holding significant theoretical and practical value.

The research constructs an analytical framework for labor migration decision-making, revealing the theoretical mechanisms through which Hukou reform influences rural-urban migration. Subsequent empirical analysis, based on China Family Panel Studies data from 2012 to 2018, demonstrates that the Hukou reform significantly promotes rural labor migration to cities. After the policy shock, the proportion of rural labor with rural Hukou decreases by 3.4% in treatment cities compared to control cities, equivalent to a 1.9% increase in urban Hukou labor and a 1.5% increase in city migrants. The Hukou reform lowers the household registration threshold and equalizes access to public services, reducing migration costs and increasing migration benefits, thereby facilitating labor force reallocation between urban and rural areas. However, constraints such as urban fiscal pressures, hometown agricultural land value, psychological and social integration costs, and unstable employment can impede the labor force reallocation effects of Hukou reform. In addition, the labor reallocation effect caused by the Hukou reform leads to the differentiation of human capital between mega cities and non-mega cities. The paper throws light on deepening the understanding of Hukou reform, ensuring public service equalization, extending the demographic dividend, and promoting balanced development in cities.

This paper contributes in three main aspects. First, it expands the literature on the household registration system and its impact on labor mobility, providing empirical evidence for potential rural-urban migration in China by evaluating the policy effects of the 2014 Hukou reform. Second, it complements existing research on the driving forces and constraining factors of internal migration. Through rigorous causal inference strategies, this study reveals the mechanisms of urban-rural labor reallocation under the new-round Hukou reform, offering insights for deepening Hukou reform and improving supporting policies. Third, it enriches research on the issues of the human capital gap between mega-cities, small and medium-sized cities, providing new evidence from the perspective of Hukou restrictions for understanding the human capital advantage and wage premium in mega-cities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] 蔡昉. (2020). 如何开启第二次人口红利? 国际经济评论, (2), 9-24.

[2] 蔡昉. (2018). 中国如何通过经济改革兑现人口红利. 经济学动态, (6), 4-14.

[3] 宋扬. (2019). 户籍改革的成本收益研究: 基于劳动力市场模型的模拟分析. 经济学(季刊), (3), 813-832.

[4] 张吉鹏, 卢冲. (2019). 户籍制度改革与城市落户门槛的量化分析. 经济学(季刊), (4), 1509-1530.

[5] 张吉鹏, 黄金, 王军辉, 等. (2020). 城市落户门槛与劳动力回流. 经济研究, (7), 175-190.

[6] 王俊. (2021). 经济集聚、技能匹配与大城市工资溢价. 管理世界, (4), 83-98.

[7] 蔡昉, 都阳, 王美艳. (2001). 户籍制度与劳动力市场保护. 经济研究, (4), 13-15.

[8] Song, Y. (2014). What should economists know about the current Chinese Hukou system? China Economic Review, 29, 200-212.

[9] Redding, S. J. (2016). Goods trade, factor mobility and welfare. Journal of International Economics, 101, 148-167.

[10] 蔡昉. (2013). 以农民工市民化推进城镇化. 经济研究, (3), 6-8.

[11] Wang, C., Akgüç, M., Liu, X., et al. (2020). Expropriation with Hukou change and labour market outcomes in China. China Economic Review, 60, 101391.

[12] Biavaschi, C., Giulietti, C., & Zimmermann, K. F. (2015). Sibling influence on the human capital of the left-behind. Journal of Human Capital, 9(4), 403-438.

[13] 张川川. (2016). 收入不平等和城市低收入家庭的住房可及性. 金融研究, (1), 99-115.

[14] 张传勇. (2018). 住房差异是否影响了家庭收入不平等: 机制假说与检验. 南开经济研究, (1), 67-85.

[15] Ngai, L. R., Pissarides, C. A., & Wang, J. (2019). China’s mobility barriers and employment allocations. Journal of the European Economic Association, 17(5), 1617-1653.

[16] 孙文凯, 白重恩, 谢沛初. (2011). 户籍制度改革对中国农村劳动力流动的影响. 经济研究, (1), 28-41.

[17] An, L., Qin, Y., Wu, J., et al. (2024). The local labor market effect of relaxing internal-migration restrictions: Evidence from China. Journal of Labor Economics, 42(1), 161-200.

[18] 徐斌, 洪双. (2014). 预期经济收益、城市生活能力与劳动力流向多元化. 区域经济评论, (5), 156-160.

[19] 刘彦随. (2011). 科学推进中国农村土地整治战略. 中国土地科学, (4), 3-8.

[20] 田旭. (2022). 隐性壁垒、城市融入与农业户籍流动人口落户. 农业经济问题, (12), 45-58.

[21] 程郁, 赵俊超, 殷浩栋, 等. (2022). 分层次推进农民工市民化: 破解“愿落不能落、能落不愿落”的两难困境. 管理世界, (4), 57-64.

[22] Fan, J. (2019). Internal geography, labor mobility and the distributional impacts of trade. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 11(3), 252-288.

[23] 朱军, 寇方超, 宋成校. (2019). 中国城市财政压力的实证评估与空间分布特征. 财贸经济, (12), 20-34.

Downloads

Published

2024-01-14

How to Cite

The Impacts of New-round Hukou Reform on Rural-urban Migration: Theoretical Mechanisms and Empirical Evidence. (2024). Modern Economic Science, 46(1), 45-59. https://doi.org/10.20069/r4en5d12

Similar Articles

31-40 of 46

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.