Research on Sustainable Mechanism of Digital Economy Enabling Green Development
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20069/jah04a45Keywords:
digital economy, green development efficiency, green technological innovation, proximity theory, threshold effect, sustainable developmentAbstract
“Digitalization” and “greening” are key directions for China’s future economic development and important driving forces and goals for achieving high-quality development in the new era. The digital economy, with its unique advantages, helps foster emerging industries, create new business models, and promote the ecologicalization of the economy, thus creating new growth points for China’s sustainable development. The integrated development of “economy + ecology” has gradually attracted high attention from the government and academia. Based on this, this paper explores whether the digital economy can enhance the efficiency of urban green development and its mechanism of action.
This study, based on the previous understanding of the linear causal relationship between the digital economy and green development, delves into the non-linear relationship between them. Using panel data from 257 prefecture-level and above cities in China from 2011 to 2019 and the “proximity” data of over 5,000 key enterprises across the country generated by Word2Vec and TF-IDF machine learning models, including cognitive, organizational, social, institutional, and geographical aspects, a two-way fixed effect model is constructed. Corresponding robustness tests and heterogeneity analyses are conducted to explore the impact of the digital economy’s development level on urban green development efficiency from the perspective of proximity, as well as the threshold effects of the digital economy itself, social and economic development, and the proximity atmosphere on their relationship.
The research findings show that: First, the digital economy has a significant positive effect on urban green development efficiency. This conclusion remains reliable after controlling for macro factors, introducing instrumental variables, and lagging the control variables by one period for robustness tests. Second, green technological innovation plays an important mediating role in the process of the digital economy enhancing green development efficiency. Third, when the development level of the digital economy is used as the threshold variable for threshold model regression, it passes the double threshold test. Within each threshold interval, the regression coefficient remains significantly positive but decreases, indicating that the impact effect on urban green development efficiency gradually weakens after crossing the threshold value. Fourth, when the proximity level of enterprises is used as the threshold variable for threshold model regression, it passes the single threshold test. That is, when the geographical, social, institutional, and cognitive proximity levels reach certain thresholds, the development level of the digital economy better promotes green development efficiency. This study concludes that the sustainability of the digital economy promoting green development stems from the overall critical mass of a region or city, which not only includes the digital economy and technological development itself but also has important connection with economic and social development, as well as the superposition and interweaving of innovation elements.
The marginal contribution of this paper can be summarized in three points: 1) Using Word2Vec and TF-IDF machine learning models to generate five major “proximity” data of cognition, organization, society, institution, and geography of more than 5,000 key enterprises nationwide, and subsequently constructing an indicator system of the proximity development levels for major cities in China, thus reconstructing and upgrading the traditional empirical econometric model to examine the causal relationship between the digital economy and urban green development efficiency; 2) Analyzing the possible non-linear relationship between the development level of digital economy and urban green development efficiency, and assessing the sustainability of the existing relationship; 3) Using the digital economy, economic development level, and various enterprise proximity dimensions as threshold variables to identify the key factors leading to the non-linear relationship between them, and providing empirical reference for proposing targeted sustainable green development policies.
Downloads
References
[1] Tapascott D. The digital economy: promise and peril in the age of networked intelligence [M]. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1996:54-68.
[2] 赵涛, 张智, 梁上坤. 数字经济、创业活跃度与高质量发展: 来自中国城市的经验证据 [J]. 管理世界, 2020, 36(10):65-76.
Zhao T, Zhang Z, Liang S K. Digital economy, entrepreneurial vitality, and high-quality development: empirical evidence from Chinese cities [J]. Management World, 2020, 36(10):65-76.
[3] Zaim O, Taskin F. Environmental efficiency in carbon dioxide emissions in the OECD: a non-parametric approach [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2000, 58(2):95-107.
[4] Arcelus F J, Arocena P. Productivity differences across OECD countries in the presence of environmental constraints [J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2005, 56(12):1352-1362.
[5] Rashidi K, Saen R F. Measuring eco-efficiency based on green indicators and potentials in energy saving and undesirable output abatement [J]. Energy Economics, 2015, 50(4):18-26.
[6] Ramanathan R. An analysis of energy consumption and carbon dioxide emissions in countries of the Middle East and North Africa [J]. Energy, 2005, 30(15):2831-2842.
[7] Yang L S, Ni M Y. Is financial development beneficial to improve the efficiency of green development? Evidence from the “Belt and Road” countries [J]. Energy Economics, 2022, 105:105734.
[8] 赵巍. 数字经济与城市绿色全要素生产率: 作用机制与门槛效应 [J]. 中国流通经济, 2022, 36(11):15-26.
Zhao W. Digital economy and urban green total factor productivity: mechanism and threshold effects [J]. China Circulation Economy, 2022, 36(11):15-26.
[9] Lyu Y W, Wang W Q, Wu Y, et al. How does digital economy affect green total factor productivity? Evidence from China [J]. The Science of the Total Environment, 2022, 857(2):159428.
[10] 张英浩, 汪明峰, 崔璐明, 等. 数字经济水平对中国市域绿色全要素生产率的影响 [J]. 经济地理, 2022, 42(9):33-42.
Zhang Y H, Wang M F, Cui L M, et al. Impact of digital economy level on urban green total factor productivity in China [J]. Economic Geography, 2022, 42(9):33-42.
[11] 杨友才, 王玉聪, 魏涛. 数字经济是否提高了绿色全要素生产率? [J]. 学习与探索, 2022, 44(12):114-123.
Yang Y C, Wang Y C, Wei T. Has digital economy improved green total factor productivity? [J]. Study and Exploration, 2022, 44(12):114-123.
[12] 李治国, 李兆哲, 王丽君. 弥合数字鸿沟激励后发城市绿色追赶: 结构性特征与传导路径 [J]. 西安交通大学学报(社会科学版), 2025, 45(3):77-91.
Li Z G, Li Z Z, Wang L J. Bridging the digital divide to stimulate the green catch-up of latecomer cities: structural characteristics and transmission path [J]. Journal of Xi’an Jiaotong University (Social Sciences), 2025, 45(3):77-91.
[13] 樊轶侠, 徐昊. 中国数字经济发展能带来经济绿色化吗: 来自我国省际面板数据的经验证据 [J]. 经济问题探索, 2021, 43(9):15-29.
Fan Y X, Xu H. Can the development of digital economy bring economic greening in China? Empirical evidence from provincial panel data [J]. Economic Problems Exploration, 2021, 43(9):15-29.
[14] Boschma R. Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment [J]. Regional Studies, 2005, 39(1):61-74.
[15] Broekel T, Boschma R. Knowledge networks in the Dutch aviation industry: the proximity paradox [J]. Journal of Economic Geography, 2012, 12(2):409-433.
[16] Balland P A, Boschma R, Frenken K. Proximity and innovation: from statics to dynamics [J]. Regional Studies, 2014, 49(6):907-920.
[17] Cassi L, Plunket A. Proximity, network formation, and inventive performance: in search of the proximity paradox [J]. The Annals of Regional Science, 2014, 53(2):395-422.
[18] 韩晶, 陈曦. 数字经济赋能绿色发展: 内在机制与经验证据 [J]. 经济社会体制比较, 2022, 37(2):73-84.
Han J, Chen X. Digital economy empowering green development: intrinsic mechanisms and empirical evidence [J]. Comparative Economic & Social Systems, 2022, 37(2):73-84.
[19] 彭继增, 朱远航, 陈腾背. 数字金融、绿色创新与制造业转型升级 [J]. 当代经济科学, 2025, 47(2):97-112.
Peng J Z, Zhu Y H, Chen T B. Digital finance, green innovation and manufacturing transformation and upgrading [J]. Modern Economic Science, 2025, 47(2):97-112.
[20] 黄群慧, 余泳泽, 张松林. 互联网发展与制造业生产率提升: 内在机制与中国经验 [J]. 中国工业经济, 2019, 37(8):5-23.
Huang Q H, Yu Y Z, Zhang S L. Internet development and manufacturing productivity improvement: intrinsic mechanisms and Chinese experience [J]. China Industrial Economics, 2019, 37(8):5-23.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Editorial Board of Modern Economic Science

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.