Income of Child-bearing Age, Children’s Human Capital and Economic Support —Based on the Perspective of Children’s Quantity-quality Trade-off

Authors

  • LI Cong School of Economics and Finance, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710061, China
  • BI Haolin School of Economics and Finance, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710061, China
  • LIU Lihua School of Economics and Finance, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710061, China
  • WANG Lan School of Economics and Finance, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710061, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20069/1z8edc15

Keywords:

demographic transition, income of child-bearing age, family support for the elderly, human capital of children, quantity-quality trade-off of children, intergenerational economic support

Abstract

China is currently undergoing a transition in its population structure, known as the “quantity-quality” transformation, referring to the shift from a “quantity-based” demographic dividend to a “quality-based” human capital dividend. This trend offers a new perspective on understanding the economic support provided by families in elderly care. Families can be seen as the smallest pay-as-you-go informal pension units. While a decrease in the number of children might reduce economic support, if the quality of children improves sufficiently to offset this decline, i.e., when the conversion rate from quantity to quality is sufficiently high, the economic support capability of children does not diminish. This raises three questions: First, can the condition of a “sufficiently high” conversion rate from quantity to quality be met? Second, what factors influence the satisfaction of this condition? Third, how can the economic support capability of children be enhanced in light of the difficult-to-reverse trend of declining birth rates? This paper aims to address these questions.

This study utilizes panel data from the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS) covering the period from 2010 to 2018. By employing the fixed-effect method for estimating lifetime income, the study assesses individuals’ income during their childbearing years. Additionally, instrumental variable and two-stage least squares methods are utilized to mitigate endogeneity. The study characterizes the conversion rate from quantity to quality within families by verifying the existence of the “quantity-quality trade-off” effect of children. Moreover, mediation effect models are employed to investigate the impact of income during the childbearing years on economic support under the mechanism of the “quantity-quality trade-off” of children. Finally, heterogeneity analysis is conducted concerning variations in the severity of declining birth rates, urban-rural disparities, and differences in participation in old-age insurance.

The research findings uncover a significant “quantity-quality trade-off” effect among children within families. A higher conversion rate from quantity to quality of children, both in total and average measures, corresponds to a more pronounced improvement in economic support. This suggests that despite a reduced number of children, enhancing their quality can partially offset the economic resources of elderly parents. Furthermore, increasing parents’ income during their childbearing years benefits the conversion from quantity to quality of children, thereby augmenting economic support. Heterogeneity analysis indicates that in families experiencing more severe declining birth rates, the conversion from quantity to quality can narrow the gap in children’s human capital and alleviate the disparity in family resources for elderly care. In families where parents do not participate in old-age insurance, the “quantity-quality trade-off” mechanism of children plays a more significant role in increasing economic support. However, in rural families, the effect of the “quantity-quality trade-off” mechanism on increasing economic support has not yet materialized. Given the current challenges of rural aging, declining birth rates, and the relative inadequacy of public pension security, this trend may impede the enhancement of rural family support capabilities.

The findings of this paper offer a new micro-level perspective on understanding the impact of the “quantity-quality” transformation in population structure on elderly care in China. They also provide insights for optimizing family support policies for the elderly: actively promoting the conversion from quantity to quality of children seems to be a feasible approach.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] 杨华磊, 张文超, 沈政. (2020). 多生育降低了产出吗? 当代经济科学, (1), 37-48.

[2] 田雪原. (2010). “未富先老”视角的人口老龄化. 南方人口, (2), 13-17.

[3] Becker, G. S., & Lewis, H. G. (1973). On the interaction between the quantity and quality of children. Journal of Political Economy, 81(2), 279-288.

[4] 张熠, 张书博, 汪润泉. (2020). 中国养老金改革的逻辑和福利效果: 基于人口“数量—质量”转换的视角. 经济研究, (8), 188-205.

[5] 黄凡, 段成荣. (2022). 从人口红利到人口质量红利: 基于第七次全国人口普查数据的分析. 人口与发展, (1), 117-126.

[6] 秦雪征, 庄晨, 杨汝岱. (2018). 计划生育对子女教育水平的影响: 来自中国的微观证据. 经济学(季刊), (3), 897-922.

[7] Qian, N. (2009). Quantity-quality and the one child policy: The only-child disadvantage in school enrolment in rural China [R]. NBER Working Paper.

[8] 程永宏. (2005). 现收现付制与人口老龄化关系定量分析. 经济研究, (3), 57-68.

[9] 王玉霞, 李灵异, 王开. (2021). 人力资本视角下的养老金替代率研究. 东北财经大学学报, (2), 56-66.

[10] 张海峰, 林细细, 张铭洪. (2018). 子女规模对家庭代际经济支持的影响: 互相卸责 or 竞相示范. 人口与经济, (4), 21-33.

[11] 张若恬, 张丹, 李树茁. (2020). 子女数量、性别和序次对养老资本的影响及城乡差异: 基于CLASS2014数据的分析. 人口与经济, (4), 68-83.

[12] 胡仕勇, 李佳. (2016). 子代数量对农村老年人代际经济支持的影响: 以亲子两代分居家庭为研究对象. 人口与经济, (5), 47-54.

[13] 牛楠, 王娜. (2014). 转型期子女数量与人力资本积累对农村养老影响实证研究: 以安徽和四川为例. 中国农业大学学报(社会科学版), (4), 64-73.

[14] 伍海霞. (2018). 城市第一代独生子女家庭亲子代际经济流动分析. 人口与发展, (5), 24-32.

[15] Willis, R. J. (1973). A new approach to the economic theory of fertility behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 81(2), 14-64.

[16] Becker, G. S. (1974). A theory of social interactions. Journal of Political Economy, 82(6), 1063-1093.

[17] Cox, D. (1987). Motives for private income transfers. Journal of Political Economy, 95(3), 508-546.

[18] 张川川, 陈斌开. (2014). “社会养老”能否替代“家庭养老”: 来自中国新型农村社会养老保险的证据. 经济研究, (11), 102-115.

[19] Justman, M., & Stiassnie, H. (2021). Intergenerational mobility in lifetime income. Review of Income and Wealth, 67(4), 928-949.

[20] Becker, G. S., & Tomes, N. (1979). An equilibrium theory of the distribution of income and intergenerational mobility. Journal of Political Economy, 87(6), 1153-1189.

[21] Lennox, C. S., Francis, J. R., & Wang, Z. (2012). Selection models in accounting research. Accounting Review, 87(2), 589-616.

[22] 赵婷. (2019). 配偶收入对女性劳动参与的影响. 经济与管理研究, (4), 65-75.

[23] Rosenzweig, M. R., & Junsen, Z. (2009). Do population control policies induce more human capital investment? Twins, birthweight, and China’s “One Child” policy. Review of Economic Studies, 76(3), 1149-1174.

[24] 易翠枝, 刘峰. (2006). 基础教育入学率、收入与《义务教育法》. 湖南社会科学, (2), 149-151.

[25] 孙晓冬, 张骏. (2021). 子女数量与中国育龄夫妻的经济依赖. 西安交通大学学报(社会科学版), (6), 129-137.

[26] 李建民. (2004). 中国农村计划生育夫妇养老问题及其社会养老保障机制研究. 中国人口科学, (3), 42-50.

Downloads

Published

2024-04-17

How to Cite

Income of Child-bearing Age, Children’s Human Capital and Economic Support —Based on the Perspective of Children’s Quantity-quality Trade-off. (2024). Modern Economic Science, 46(2), 30-44. https://doi.org/10.20069/1z8edc15

Similar Articles

21-30 of 52

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.