Digital Finance, Digital Divide and Household Financial Portfolio Effectiveness — An Analysis Based on the Perspective of Urban-rural Differences

Authors

  • WANG Xiaohua Center for Inclusive Finance and Agricultural & Rural Development, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China
  • LI Xinru Institute of Finance and Economics, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai 200433, China
  • SONG Meng College of Economics and Management, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China
  • MA Xiaoke School of Economics and Resource Management, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20069/syhst094

Keywords:

digital finance, asset portfolios, household finance, digital divide, digital literacy

Abstract

Constrained by disparities in urban-rural and regional development, traditional financial services still face challenges of low coverage and high financing costs, hindering their effective role in promoting agricultural, farmer, and rural development. However, the emergence of digital finance, resulting from the fusion of finance and technology, is reshaping the operational landscape of the financial industry. Digital finance addresses longstanding issues such as the lack of standard collateral and information asymmetry in financial services for agriculture, farmers, and rural areas. Its advancement is anticipated to bridge the digital gap between urban and rural regions, empowering farmers to benefit from reforms and development, thereby serving as a potent instrument for rural revitalization and fostering shared prosperity.

This study employs data from the Peking University Digital Financial Inclusion Index of China (PKU-DFIIC) and the China Household Finance Survey (CHFS) 2019 to comprehensively analyze the impact of digital financial development on urban and rural household financial asset portfolios. The findings indicate that while digital financial development enhances the effectiveness of both urban and rural household financial asset portfolios, it disproportionately favors urban households, potentially exacerbating the urban-rural gap in portfolio effectiveness. Specifically, greater utilization of digital finance and the level of inclusivity in its digitalization amplify the effectiveness of urban and rural household financial asset portfolios, predominantly benefiting urban households.

Furthermore, to delve deeper into the influence of digital finance on optimizing household financial asset portfolios, this study dissects the digital divide into primary and secondary levels. It explores the prospect of narrowing the effectiveness gap in household financial asset portfolios between urban and rural areas by bridging different levels of the digital divide. The research underscores the digital divide as a critical impediment to digital finance’s role in enhancing household financial asset portfolios. Notably, digital financial development significantly boosts the effectiveness of household financial asset portfolios in both urban and rural areas once households overcome primary and secondary digital divides. Thus, the key to leveraging digital finance for enhanced portfolio effectiveness lies in mitigating the digital divide.

Moreover, this paper quantifies the secondary digital divide based on digital finance usage and further delineates it into digital finance and digital credit divides. It delves into the distinct roles of bridging the digital finance and digital credit divides in augmenting the effectiveness of urban and rural household financial asset portfolios amid various barriers to digital financial service usage. This expands the research and policy scope of digital finance. The policy implications underscore the imperative to expedite the construction of an inclusive digital finance pathway, establish robust institutional mechanisms for nurturing digital and financial literacy among urban and rural residents, continually narrow the digital divide between information-rich and information-poor demographics, and enhance the effectiveness of residents’ household financial asset portfolios.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] 习近平. (2021). 扎实推动共同富裕. 求是, (20), 4-8.

[2] 王小华, 马小珂, 何茜. (2022). 数字金融使用促进农村消费内需动力全面释放了吗? 中国农村经济, (11), 21-39.

[3] 刘淑春. (2019). 中国数字经济高质量发展的靶向路径与政策供给. 经济学家, (6), 52-61.

[4] 何宗樾, 张勋, 万广华. (2020). 数字金融、数字鸿沟与多维贫困. 统计研究, (10), 79-89.

[5] 许竹青, 郑风田, 陈洁. (2013). “数字鸿沟”还是“信息红利”? 信息的有效供给与农民的销售价格: 一个微观角度的实证研究. 经济学(季刊), (4), 1513-1536.

[6] 郭峰, 王靖一, 王芳, 等. (2020). 测度中国数字普惠金融发展: 指数编制与空间特征. 经济学(季刊), (4), 1401-1418.

[7] 周雨晴, 何广文. (2020). 数字普惠金融发展对农户家庭金融资产配置的影响. 当代经济科学, (3), 92-105.

[8] 吴雨, 李晓, 李洁, 等. (2021). 数字金融发展与家庭金融资产组合有效性. 管理世界, (7), 92-104.

[9] 邱泽奇, 张樹沁, 刘世定, 等. (2016). 从数字鸿沟到红利差异: 互联网资本的视角. 中国社会科学, (10), 93-115.

[10] 张勋, 万广华, 吴海涛. (2021). 缩小数字鸿沟: 中国特色数字金融发展. 中国社会科学, (8), 35-51.

[11] 王修华, 赵亚雄. (2022). 数字金融发展与城乡家庭金融可得性差异. 中国农村经济, (1), 44-60.

[12] 黄益平, 黄卓. (2018). 中国的数字金融发展: 现在与未来. 经济学(季刊), (4), 1489-1502.

[13] Bachas, P., Gertler, P., Higgins, S., et al. (2018). Digital financial services go a long way: Transaction costs and financial inclusion. American Economic Review, 108, 444-448.

[14] 陈梦根, 周元任. (2022). 数字不平等研究新进展. 经济学动态, (4), 123-139.

[15] 程名望, 张家平. (2019). 互联网普及与城乡收入差距: 理论与实证. 中国农村经济, (2), 19-41.

[16] 霍鹏, 殷浩栋. (2022). 弥合城乡数字鸿沟的理论基础、行动逻辑与实践路径: 基于“网络扶贫行动计划”的分析. 中国农业大学学报(社会科学版), (5), 183-196.

[17] Cairncross, F. (1997). The death of distance: How the communications revolution is changing our lives. Brighton, Massachusetts: Harvard Business Review Press, 238.

[18] 粟芳, 方蕾. (2016). 中国农村金融排斥的区域差异: 供给不足还是需求不足: 银行、保险和互联网金融的比较分析. 管理世界, (9), 70-83.

[19] 张勋, 万广华, 张佳佳, 等. (2019). 数字经济、普惠金融与包容性增长. 经济研究, (8), 71-86.

[20] 路晓蒙, 李阳, 甘犁, 等. (2017). 中国家庭金融投资组合的风险: 过于保守还是过于冒进? 管理世界, (12), 92-108.

[21] 吴卫星, 吴锟, 张旭阳. (2018). 金融素养与家庭资产组合有效性. 国际金融研究, (5), 66-75.

[22] Mankiw, N. G., & Zeldes, S. P. (1991). The consumption of stockholders and non-stockholders. Journal of Financial Economics, 29(1), 97-112.

[23] Tracy, J., Schneider, H., & Chan, S. (1999). Are stocks overtaking real estate in household portfolios? Current Issues in Economics and Finance, 5(5), 1-6.

[24] Edwards, R. D. (2010). Optimal portfolio choice when utility depends on health. International Journal of Economic Theory, 6(2), 205-225.

[25] Weber, E. U., & Hsee, C. K. (1999). Models and mosaics: Investigating cross-cultural differences in risk perception and risk preference. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6(4), 611-617.

[26] 吴卫星, 丘艳春, 张琳琬. (2015). 中国居民家庭投资组合有效性: 基于夏普率的研究. 世界经济, (1), 154-172.

[27] 何婧, 李庆海. (2019). 数字金融使用与农户创业行为. 中国农村经济, (1), 112-126.

[28] 尹志超, 蒋佳伶, 严雨. (2021). 数字鸿沟影响家庭收入吗? 财贸经济, (9), 66-82.

[29] Riggins, F. J., & Dewan, S. (2005). The digital divide: Current and future research directions. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 6(12), 298-337.

[30] Van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2005). The deepening divide: Inequality in the information society. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications, 25.

Downloads

Published

2024-04-20

How to Cite

Digital Finance, Digital Divide and Household Financial Portfolio Effectiveness — An Analysis Based on the Perspective of Urban-rural Differences. (2024). Modern Economic Science, 46(2), 45-58. https://doi.org/10.20069/syhst094

Similar Articles

21-30 of 47

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.