Transition Finance: Connotation, Framework, and Future Prospects

Authors

  • WANG Yao International Institute of Green Finance, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing 100081, China
  • ZHANG Guangxiao School of Finance, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing 100081, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20069/fbfq1k25

Keywords:

transition finance, low-carbon economy, carbon-intensive enterprises, transition risks, resource allocation, transition finance approaches

Abstract

The latest IPCC assessment report highlights that climate change has caused widespread adverse impacts and economic losses to nature and humans. Governments and private-sector firms around the world have committed to reducing carbon emissions with the goal of limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees. As of 2022, over 130 countries and regions, representing 91% of global GDP and 83% of global greenhouse gas emissions, have made a net-zero commitment. In this context, “transition finance” is gaining traction among governments and market participants.

The concept of transition finance has recently emerged, and there is no internationally unified standard definition. This paper posits that transition finance refers to the financial services required to support the orderly transition of the real economy towards the net-zero goal. From a functional perspective, transition finance can serve as an expansion and extension of green finance, focusing on supporting carbon-intensive enterprises that have clear plans for reducing carbon emissions. The essence of transition finance lies in a series of capital market instruments with specific functions aimed at promoting the low-carbon transition of the real economy. These instruments can help enterprises manage their transition risks to maintain future competitiveness.

Based on existing initiatives and market practices, this paper explores the fundamental principles of transition finance development and analyzes the positioning and roles of various stakeholders, including the government, enterprises, and financial sectors. In addition, by comparing the main global transition finance approaches and summarizing the common requirements for developing transition finance, the basic content of the five-point transition financial framework was established. First, develop a transition financial support catalog or principles to clarify transition goals; second, develop necessary transition plans that are aligned with internal strategy; third, develop appropriate transition financial instruments; fourth, carry out transition-related information disclosure and assessment; fifth, enforce transition-related policy incentives. This paper explains the basic meaning, necessity of existence, main content included, and current practices in major countries or regions for each item.

Overall, the development of transition finance has just begun, and there are still many challenges. These include the lack of unified transitional standards, an imperfect information disclosure system, and the difficulty in managing transition risks. In the future, the government can enhance the coordination and binding force of the top-level policy system, unify and improve the definition standards of transition finance. The market and regulators can focus on stimulating the vitality of transition finance and enhancing the ability to address risks associated with transition finance. Furthermore, academia and research institutions should actively engage in theoretical innovation regarding transition finance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Global warming of 1.5 °C: IPCC special report on impacts of global warming of 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels in context of strengthening response to climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022:12-15.

[2] 马骏.《G20转型金融框架》及对中国的借鉴[J]. 中国金融, 2022(23):21-23.

[3] 马骏. 碳中和与转型金融[J]. 新金融, 2022(9):4-7.

[4] Caldecott B. Defining transition finance and embedding it in the post-Covid-19 recovery[J]. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 2022, 12(3):934-938.

[5] Cotton D. Transition finance and markets[J]. ACRN Journal of Finance and Risk Perspectives, 2020, 9(1):137-147.

[6] 李岩柏, 郭瑞敏. 国际转型金融发展对我国的启示[J]. 河北金融, 2022(6):3-8.

[7] 王遥, 任玉洁, 金子曦. 推动“双碳”目标实现的转型金融发展建议[J]. 新金融, 2022(6):38-43.

[8] 王韧. “双碳”背景下我国转型金融的发展路径探究[J]. 理论学刊, 2022(4):100-108.

[9] Chavas J. Environmental externalities and cost of capital[J]. Management Science, 2014, 60(9):2223-2247.

[10] Bolton P, Despres M, Pereira da Silva L, et al. The green swan: central banking and financial stability in the age of climate change[R]. Bank for International Settlements Working Paper, 2020.

[11] Piemonte C, Cattaneo O, Morris R, et al. Transition finance: introducing a new concept[R]. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Publishing, 2019.

[12] Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. OECD guidance on transition finance: ensuring credibility of corporate climate transition plans[R]. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Publishing, 2020.

[13] Kemfert C, Schäfer D, Semmler W. Great green transition and finance[J]. Intereconomics, 2020, 55:181-186.

[14] 王遥, 张广逍. “双碳”愿景下的金融转型研究[J]. 环境保护, 2021(14):9-11.

[15] Skea J, Shukla P R, Reisinger A, et al. Summary for policymakers[M]//Climate change 2022: mitigation of climate change: contribution of working group ii to the sixth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022:1-2.

[16] International Energy Agency. Net zero by 2050[R]. International Energy Agency Working Paper, 2021.

[17] Ilhan E, Sautner Z, Vilkov G. Carbon tail risk[J]. The Review of Financial Studies, 2021, 34(3):1540-1571.

[18] Busch T, Lewandowski S. Corporate carbon and financial performance: a meta-analysis[J]. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2018, 22(4):745-759.

[19] Trinks A, Mulder M, Scholtens B. An efficiency perspective on carbon emissions and financial performance[J]. Ecological Economics, 2020, 175:106632.

[20] Capasso G, Gianfrate G, Spinelli M. Climate change and credit risk[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 266:121634.

[21] Trinks A, Ibikunle G, Mulder M, et al. Carbon intensity and the cost of equity capital[J]. The Energy Journal, 2022, 43(2):181-214.

[22] Maaloul A. The effect of greenhouse gas emissions on cost of debt: evidence from Canadian firms[J]. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 2018, 25(6):1407-1415.

[23] Kumar P, Firoz M. Impact of carbon emissions on cost of debt: evidence from India[J]. Managerial Finance, 2018, 44(12):1401-1417.

[24] Amin A S, Hossain A T, Ranasinghe T, et al. Carbon risk and real earnings management[R]. Rotman School of Management Working Paper, 2021.

[25] Lemmatt T, Shabestari M A, Freedman M, et al. Corporate carbon risk exposure, voluntary disclosure, and financial reporting quality[J]. Business Strategy and the Environment, 2020, 29(5):2130-2143.

[26] Velte P. Environmental performance, carbon performance and earnings management: empirical evidence for the European capital market[J]. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 2021, 28(1):42-53.

[27] Tandon A. Transition finance: investigating the state of play: a stocktake of emerging approaches and financial instruments[R]. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Publishing, 2021.

[28] Semieniuk G, Campiglio E, Mercure J F, et al. Low-carbon transition risks for finance[J]. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 2021, 12(1):e678.

[29] Delis M D, De Greiff K, Ongena S. Being stranded with fossil fuel reserves? Climate policy risk and the pricing of bank loans[EB/OL]. (2019-09-11)[2024-01-15]. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/srn.3451335

.

[30] Olovsson C. Is climate change relevant for central banks?[J]. Sveriges Riksbank Economic Commentaries, 2018, 13(13):1-8.

[31] Battiston S, Mandel A, Monasterolo I, et al. A climate stress-test of the financial system[J]. Nature Climate Change, 2017, 7(4):283-288.

[32] Van der Ploeg F, Rezai A. Stranded assets in the transition to a carbon-free economy[J]. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 2020, 12:281-298.

[33] Calice P, Reinders H J. An exploration of climate-related financial risks for credit guarantee schemes in Europe[R]. The World Bank Working Paper, 2022.

[34] Oestreicher A M, Tsiakas I. Carbon emissions and stock returns: evidence from the EU emissions trading scheme[J]. Journal of Banking & Finance, 2015, 58:294-308.

[35] Cao J, Li Y, Zhan X, et al. Carbon emissions, mutual fund trading, and the liquidity of corporate bonds[EB/OL]. (2023-01-12)[2024-01-15]. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/srn.3881497

.

[36] Bolton P, Kacperczyk M. Do investors care about carbon risk?[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2021, 142(2):517-549.

[37] Harrison C, MacGeoch M, Michetti C. Sustainable debt global state of the market 2021[R]. Climate Bonds Initiative Working Paper, 2022.

[38] Michetti C. Sustainable debt global state of the market 2022[R]. Climate Bonds Initiative Working Paper, 2023.

[39] Rosemberg A. Building a just transition: the linkages between climate change and employment[J]. International Journal of Labour Research, 2010, 2(2):125-161.

[40] Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero. Financial institution net-zero transition plans: fundamentals, recommendations, and guidance[R]. Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero Working Paper, 2022.

[41] Investor Group on Climate Change. Corporate climate transition plans: a guide to investor expectations[R]. Investor Group on Climate Change Working Paper, 2022.

[42] Robins N, Muller S, Tickell S, et al. Just zero: 2021 report of the UK financing a just transition alliance[R]. Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment, London School of Economics and Political Science, 2021.

[43] Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures. Task force on climate-related financial disclosures guidance on metrics, targets, and transition plans[R]. Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures, 2021.

[44] Carbon Disclosure Project. Climate transition plan: discussion paper[R]. Carbon Disclosure Project Working Paper, 2021.

[45] Climate Policy Initiative. What makes a transition plan credible? Considerations for financial institutions[R]. Climate Policy Initiative Working Paper, 2022.

[46] 崔恺媛. 上市企业环保信息披露与股票投资者社会环境偏好[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2017(4):136-143.

[47] 黎文靖, 路晓燕. 机构投资者关注企业的环境绩效吗?[J]. 金融研究, 2015(12):97-112.

[48] 王遥, 任玉洁. “双碳”目标下的中国绿色金融体系构建[J]. 当代经济科学, 2022(5):1-13.

[49] Network for Greening the Financial System. Enhancing market transparency in green and transition finance[R]. Network for Greening the Financial System Working Paper, 2022.

[50] Nordhaus W D. An optimal transition path for controlling greenhouse gases[J]. Science, 1992, 258(5086):1315-1319.

[51] Zon A V, Yetkiner I H. An endogenous growth model with embodied energy-saving technical change[J]. Resource & Energy Economics, 2003, 25(1):81-103.

Downloads

Published

2024-07-02

How to Cite

Transition Finance: Connotation, Framework, and Future Prospects. (2024). Modern Economic Science, 46(3), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.20069/fbfq1k25