From “Competitive Saving” to “Competitive Investment”: Revisiting the Impact of Gender Imbalance on Chinese Households’ Financial Decision

Authors

  • LIN Zhifan Advanced Research Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Zhuhai 519087, China
  • LIAO Wenjun Audit Bureau of Pingxiang City, Pingxiang 337099, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20069/f6fng802

Keywords:

gender imbalance, competitive savings, competitive investment, risky financial investment, marriage market, household finance, financial literacy

Abstract

Despite low financial literacy among Chinese residents, the proportion of families participating in risky financial investments has risen over the past decade. What factors and mechanisms drive this phenomenon? This paper explores the role of gender imbalance in this context. China faces the world’s most severe gender imbalance, leading to a “male squeeze” in the marriage market. Building on the “competitive savings” theory by Wei & Zhang (2011, JPE), this article argues that as the financial system develops and the supply of various risky financial assets expands, traditional risk-free savings struggle to maintain and grow wealth. Consequently, Chinese families are increasingly turning to risky financial investments to enhance the competitiveness of their unmarried sons in the marriage market through higher income and wealth.

This paper employs data from three rounds of the China Household Finance Survey (CHFS) in 2015, 2017, and 2019 to identify causal relationships using a generalized difference-in-differences model. This model uses information on whether a family’s first child is male and the gender ratio differences in the family’s province. The study finds that: 1) In provinces with higher gender imbalance, families with sons are more inclined to participate in financial markets and hold more risky assets, though no evidence of “competitive real estate investment” was found. 2) Families with low financial knowledge and unmarried sons are more sensitive to gender imbalance in their risky financial decisions.

This paper contributes to the literature in three ways: First, by combining three rounds of CHFS data (2015, 2017, and 2019) to construct a large, up-to-date sample, it better reflects the dynamics of China’s household financial behavior. Second, it examines family involvement in the stock market, various risky financial decisions, investment intensity, and real estate investment willingness, offering a comprehensive depiction of how gender imbalance affects household financial behavior. Third, it conducts heterogeneity tests based on financial knowledge and the age of unmarried sons, enriching the research findings.

The findings reveal that Chinese families’ involvement in risky financial markets due to gender imbalance may be driven by the allure of high returns, potentially overlooking hidden risks. The Chinese government should promote financial literacy and investor education among residents and emphasize rational investment participation. This approach can effectively mitigate risks from grassroots participants and ensure the stability and healthy development of the financial system.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Markowitz H. Portfolio selection [J]. Journal of Finance, 1952, 7(1):77-91.

[2] 尹志超, 黄倩. 股市有限参与之谜研究述评 [J]. 经济评论, 2013(6):144-150.

[3] Wei S. J., Zhang X. B. The competitive saving motive: evidence from rising sex ratios and savings rates in China [J]. Journal of Political Economy, 2011, 119(3):511-564.

[4] 费孝通. 江村经济 [M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2012:31.

[5] Alesina A., Giuliano P., Nunn N. On the origins of gender roles: women and the plough [J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2013, 128(2):469-530.

[6] Ebenstein A., Leung S. Son preference and access to social insurance: evidence from China’s rural pension program [J]. Population and Development Review, 2010, 36(1):47-70.

[7] Li H., Yi J., Zhang J. Estimating the effect of the one-child policy on the sex ratio imbalance in China: identification based on the difference-in-differences [J]. Demography, 2011, 48(4):1535-1557.

[8] Chen Y., Li H., Meng L. Prenatal sex selection and missing girls in China: evidence from the diffusion of diagnostic ultrasound [J]. Journal of Human Resources, 2013, 48(1):36-70.

[9] 李长洪, 林志帆. 放松生育限制将如何影响性别失衡: 基于“一孩半”政策的理论分析与实证检验 [J]. 经济学(季刊), 2023(2):695-711.

[10] 梁若冰. 财政激励与消失的女性 [J]. 经济学(季刊), 2019(2):461-482.

[11] 黄玖立, 刘畅. 方言与社会信任 [J]. 财经研究, 2017(7):83-94.

[12] Sharygin E., Ebenstein A., Das Gupta M. Implications of China’s future bride shortage for the geographical distribution and social protection needs of never-married men [J]. Population Studies, 2013, 67(1):39-59.

[13] 方丽, 田传浩. 筑好巢才能引好凤: 农村住房投资与婚姻缔结 [J]. 经济学(季刊), 2016(2):571-596.

[14] 胡明志, 陈卓. 为结婚而买房: 城市房产与婚姻缔结 [J]. 中国经济问题, 2022(5):169-181.

[15] 张川川, 陶美娟. 性别比失衡、婚姻支付与代际支持 [J]. 经济科学, 2020(2):87-100.

[16] Li W. C., Song C. C., Xu S., et al. High sex ratios and household portfolio choice in China [J]. Journal of Human Resources, 2022, 57(2):465-490.

[17] 靳小怡, 段朱清, 孟阳, 等. 少难成家、老无所依: 性别失衡下的男性婚姻挤压与家庭发展风险 [J]. 西安交通大学学报(社会科学版), 2023(6):164-177.

[18] Wei S. J., Zhang X. B., Liu Y. Homeownership as status competition: some theory and evidence [J]. Journal of Development Economics, 2017, 127(7):169-186.

[19] 钟粤俊, 董志强, 林文炼. 家庭男孩比重影响了流动人口创业吗? [J]. 劳动经济研究, 2018(2):3-23.

[20] 蓝嘉俊, 方颖, 魏下海. 性别比失衡下的婚姻匹配与劳动力市场表现: 基于独生子女政策准自然实验的实证分析 [J]. 世界经济文汇, 2019(4):67-84.

[21] Yuan Y., Zhao R., Xu L. Does sex imbalance affect family businesses? Evidence from rural China [J]. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 2020, 41(1):4-18.

[22] Tan Z., Wei S. J., Zhang X. Deadly discrimination: implications of “missing girls” for workplace safety [J]. Journal of Development Economics, 2021, 152:102678.

[23] 王临风, 余玲铮, 金钊. 性别失衡、婚姻挤压与个体劳动参与 [J]. 劳动经济研究, 2018(3):75-96.

[24] 章元, 孙诗怡. 性别比失衡对妻子及其子女福利的影响: 来自CFPS的证据 [J]. 上海经济, 2023(6):56-73.

[25] 梁斌, 陈茹. 子女性别与家庭金融资产选择 [J]. 经济学(季刊), 2022(4):1299-1318.

[26] 魏下海, 万江滔. 人口性别结构与家庭资产选择: 性别失衡的视角 [J]. 经济评论, 2020(5):152-164.

[27] 甘犁, 尹志超, 贾男, 等. 中国家庭资产状况及住房需求分析 [J]. 金融研究, 2013(4):1-14.

[28] 尹志超, 宋全云, 吴雨. 金融知识、投资经验与家庭资产选择 [J]. 经济研究, 2014(4):62-75.

[29] Ebenstein A. The “missing girls” of China and the unintended consequences of the one-child policy [J]. Journal of Human Resources, 2010, 45(1):87-115.

[30] Athey S., Imbens G. T. The state of applied econometrics: causality and policy evaluation [J]. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2017, 31(2):3-32.

Downloads

Published

2024-11-02

How to Cite

From “Competitive Saving” to “Competitive Investment”: Revisiting the Impact of Gender Imbalance on Chinese Households’ Financial Decision. (2024). Modern Economic Science, 46(4), 41-53. https://doi.org/10.20069/f6fng802

Similar Articles

31-40 of 50

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.