The Urban and Rural Resident Basic Medical Insurance Reform and the Release of Consumption Potential of Chinese Rural Residents

Authors

  • MO Xuchen School of Economics, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China
  • SHEN Yangyang School of Economics and Resource Management, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
  • ZHOU Yunbo Center for Studies of Political Economy, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20069/9ekz9f39

Keywords:

insurance reform, rural consumption, consumption potential, average propensity to consume, health insurance

Abstract

Unlocking the consumption potential of rural markets is a critical pathway to enhancing the domestic economic circulation in China. A robust medical insurance system mitigates the financial risks of medical expenditures, stabilizes household expectations, and boosts consumption. While previous studies have explored the impact of medical insurance on residents’ consumption levels, the direct relationship between medical insurance reforms and average consumption propensity—a key indicator of consumption potential—has received limited attention. This paper systematically examines the effects of the Urban and Rural Resident Basic Medical Insurance (URRBMI) reform on rural consumption potential in China. First, it constructs a two-stage survival model to analyze how disease shocks influence income and expenditure uncertainties, providing a theoretical framework for understanding the URRBMI reform’s impact on rural residents’ average consumption propensity. Second, using data from the China Household Finance Survey (CHFS) spanning 2013 to 2019, the study employs a progressive difference-in-differences (DID) approach to empirically evaluate the reform’s effects. Third, the paper investigates the influence of changes in financing levels and benefit structures of the URRBMI on rural residents’ consumption potential and healthcare utilization post-2020. The study yields several important conclusions. First, the URRBMI reform has significantly increased the average consumption propensity of rural residents, thereby unlocking rural consumption potential. Its effects are particularly pronounced among lower-income groups and regions with higher levels of system integration. Second, the reform enhances rural consumption propensity by improving healthcare-seeking behaviors and reducing income uncertainties. However, due to the rapid increase in demand for medical services and induced consumption behaviors, the reform has not substantially reduced rural residents’ medical expenditure risks. Third, the URRBMI reform has contributed to upgrading the consumption structure in rural areas. Fourth, the post-2020 decline in the number of URRBMI participants is not due to increased financing standards but is instead attributed to individuals transitioning to the Urban Employee Basic Medical Insurance (UEBMI) system and the reduction in duplicate insurance coverage. To optimize the policy’s outcomes, the government should focus on improving the compensation mechanism and supporting regulatory measures to address the high cost of healthcare for rural residents. Additionally, policymakers should prioritize the gradual establishment of a universal and integrated medical insurance system to promote equitable benefits across all population groups. This study provides several key contributions. First, from a research perspective, it focuses on average consumption propensity as a direct link between income and consumption, offering a novel approach to understanding consumption potential. By examining the impact of URRBMI reform through the lens of consumption propensity, the paper deepens insights into rural consumption dynamics. Second, the theoretical framework innovatively integrates disease shocks into a two-period survival model, accounting for income and expenditure uncertainties to analyze the internal mechanisms through which the URRBMI reform influences consumption behavior. This approach enriches the existing theoretical literature. Third, the use of a progressive DID method refines empirical analysis, addressing methodological gaps in prior studies. The findings provide critical data and decision-making references for advancing urban-rural medical insurance integration. A more equitable, universal medical security system can effectively enhance rural residents’ financial stability, consumption capacity, and overall well-being.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] 习近平. 高举中国特色社会主义伟大旗帜 为全面建设社会主义现代化国家而团结奋斗: 在中国共产党第二十次全国代表大会上的报告[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2022:28.

[2] 陈昌盛, 许伟, 兰宗敏, 等. 我国消费倾向的基本特征、发展态势与提升策略[J]. 管理世界, 2021(8):46-58.

[3] 王蕴, 姜雪, 李清彬, 等. 消费倾向的国际比较与促进中国消费倾向稳步提升的建议[J]. 宏观经济研究, 2022(3):30-45.

[4] Bonekamp J, Wouterse B. Do different shocks in health matter for wealth[J]. Journal of Health Economics, 2022, 87:102719.

[5] Mommaerts C, Razash, Zheng Y. The economic consequences of hospitalizations for older workers across countries[J]. The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, 2020, 16:100213.

[6] Gruber J, Yelowitz A. Public health insurance and private savings[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1999, 107:1249-1274.

[7] Bai C, Wu B. Health insurance and consumption: evidence from China’s New Cooperative Medical Scheme[J]. Journal of Comparative Economics, 2014, 42(2):450-469.

[8] 马双, 臧文斌, 甘犁. 新型农村合作医疗保险对农村居民食物消费的影响分析[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2011(1):249-270.

[9] 白重恩, 李宏彬, 吴斌珍. 医疗保险与消费: 来自新型农村合作医疗的证据[J]. 经济研究, 2012(2):41-53.

[10] 程令国, 张晔. “新农合”: 经济绩效还是健康绩效?[J]. 经济研究, 2012(1):120-133.

[11] 臧文斌, 陈晨, 赵绍阳. 社会医疗保险、疾病异质性和医疗费用[J]. 经济研究, 2020(12):64-79.

[12] 王晓亚, 黄德海, 卜鹏滨. 医疗保险的双重效应与居民医疗支出: 作用机理及实证检验[J]. 当代经济科学, 2018(5):1-11.

[13] 邵全权, 郝天琪. 健康风险、医疗保险与消费[J]. 保险研究, 2020(12):18-37.

[14] 甘犁, 赵乃宝, 孙永智. 收入不平等、流动性约束与中国家庭储蓄率[J]. 经济研究, 2018(12):34-50.

[15] 廖朴, 刘金浩, 冯璐. 健康公平视角下的城乡居民医疗支出不平等研究: 基于生命周期模型[J]. 当代经济科学, 2024(2):1-16.

[16] 王树森, 杨澄宇. 卫生支出结构、个人健康投资与居民福利[J]. 经济研究, 2023(6):190-208.

[17] 黄家林, 傅虹桥, 宋泽. 补充医疗保险对居民消费的影响: 来自城乡居民大病保险的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2022(10):58-76.

[18] 易行健, 张凌霜, 徐舒, 等. 商业健康保险、预防性储蓄动机与居民消费支出: 理论与经验证据[J]. 金融研究, 2023(4):130-148.

[19] 刘琪, 何韶华, 李飞飞, 等. 城乡统筹医保能促进农村老年人消费吗: 来自CHARLS的证据[J]. 湖南农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2021(4):40-51.

[20] Yu S.H, Ma X.X, Zhan P. Effects of the resident basic medical insurance reform on household consumption in China[J]. China & World Economy, 2024, 32(1):96-129.

[21] 袁辉, 李欣瑞. 城乡医保统筹、预防性储蓄与农村家庭教育支出[J]. 农村经济, 2022(1):118-126.

[22] 蒋云赟, 郑恺. 城乡居民医疗保险统筹、农村就医行为与消费支出[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版), 2022(5):126-138.

[23] 封进, 陈昕欣, 胡博. 效率与公平统一的医疗保险水平: 来自城乡居民医疗保险制度整合的证据[J]. 经济研究, 2022(6):154-172.

[24] 张翼. 当前中国社会各阶层的消费倾向: 从生存性消费到发展性消费[J]. 社会学研究, 2016(4):74-97.

[25] 万广华, 史清华, 汤树梅. 转型经济中农户储蓄行为: 中国农村的实证研究[J]. 经济研究, 2003(5):3-12.

[26] 张诚, 翁希演, 尹志超. 农村居民城镇化如何影响家庭储蓄率[J]. 中国农村经济, 2023(8):126-147.

[27] 马光荣, 周广肃. 新型农村养老保险对家庭储蓄的影响: 基于CFPS数据的研究[J]. 经济研究, 2014(11):116-129.

[28] 张勋, 万广华, 张佳佳, 等. 数字经济、普惠金融与包容性增长[J]. 经济研究, 2019(8):71-86.

[29] 王贞, 封进, 刘一恒. 门诊待遇非线性定价与住院率: 来自城乡居民基本医保的证据[J]. 经济研究, 2023(12):132-149.

[30] 周慧, 吴宇涵, 岳希明. 医疗报销比例与居民就医行为: 基于CHIP2018的实证分析[J]. 南开经济研究, 2024(1):205-220.

[31] 罗楚亮. 经济转轨、不确定性与城镇居民消费行为[J]. 经济研究, 2004(4):100-106.

Downloads

Published

2025-01-24

How to Cite

The Urban and Rural Resident Basic Medical Insurance Reform and the Release of Consumption Potential of Chinese Rural Residents. (2025). Modern Economic Science, 47(1), 30-43. https://doi.org/10.20069/9ekz9f39

Similar Articles

21-30 of 31

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.