Endogenous Mechanism of Global Production Network Evolution and China’s Role

Authors

  • GAO Luwen College of Business, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai 200433, China
  • GAN Chunhui Institute of Applied Economics, Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences, Shanghai 200020, China
  • YU Hongxin Business Economics College, Shanghai Business School, Shanghai 200235, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20069/m0xks380

Keywords:

global production network, intermediate goods trade, endogenous mechanism of network evolution, production cooperation relationship, reciprocity effect, transmission closure effect, Matthew Effect, industrial chain stability

Abstract

Building diversified and stable trade relations is a crucial measure to ensure the security of China’s industrial chains. With the rapid development of globalization production patterns characterized by intra-product specialization, the internal structure of global production networks has gradually become more complex. As an important medium for transmitting market information, the complex network structure of production networks not only accelerates the speed of information transmission but also reduces errors in information dissemination, thereby helping to break down information barriers among economies within the production networks. So, does the existing complex structure within global production networks facilitate economies in expanding new cooperation partners and forming diversified and stable production cooperation relationship? In other words, does the evolution of global production networks possess an endogenous mechanism? This has emerged as an important research topic.

Based on trade data for 3,198 intermediate goods across 97 economies worldwide from 2000 to 2021, this article constructs a global production network and employs a Temporal Exponential Random Graph Model (TERGM) to explore the endogenous mechanisms of network evolution. Furthermore, it conducts an in-depth analysis of China’s role within the framework of these endogenous mechanisms. The research reveals the following findings: Firstly, the reciprocal effect of non-reciprocal structures, the transitive closure effect of two-path structures, and the Matthew effect of star-shaped structures constitute the endogenous mechanisms driving the evolution of the global production network. Secondly, China plays a significant role in the evolution of the global production network by constructing reciprocal structures and leveraging the role of third-party markets. Additionally, due to the transitive closure effect arising from China’s intermediary role, economies such as Tanzania, New Zealand, and Panama are expected to expand their export markets in the field of integrated circuits.

This study contributes to the literature in two main ways. First, compared to studies that discuss the evolution mechanisms of the global trade network from the perspective of external network factors, this article explores the endogenous driving mechanisms of the evolution of the global production network from the perspective of internal network structure. This enriches research in the field of trade network evolution mechanisms and provides a new research perspective for economies to expand new trade relations. Second, in contrast to existing studies that primarily analyze China’s role in global economic development based on import and export trade volumes, this article discusses China’s role in the evolution of the global production network from the perspective of the endogenous mechanisms of this evolution. This effectively counters attempts by some Western countries to “de-sinicization” and “decouple” from China, and offers new research insights for ensuring the stability of global and Chinese industrial chains.

The research conclusions have significant practical implications for China in expanding its new “circle of friends”, building a diversified and stable trade pattern, ensuring the security of industrial chains, and forming a new development paradigm of “dual circulation”. They also provide theoretical references for maintaining the stability of global industrial chains. The policy implications of this paper are as follows: First, China needs to take the lead in becoming the “originator” of production cooperation relationship. Second, China needs to take full advantage of its position as a “bridge” in the global production network. Third, China needs to establish an information exchange platform for domestic import and export enterprises.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] 王文宇, 贺灿飞, 陈新明. 贸易壁垒、贸易协定与中国制造业出口网络演化[J]. 经济地理, 2021(11):118-128.

[2] 冯耕中, 刘祺, 朱佳雯, 等. 产业链供应链安全评估与应对策略[J]. 西安交通大学学报(社会科学版), 2023(6):106-116.

[3] 干春晖, 高录问, 蔡均. 中国“外循环”前向依赖网络结构特征及上游断裂风险传导路径研究[J]. 国际经贸探索, 2023(9):49-64.

[4] 孙浦阳, 刘伊黎, 蒋殿春. 企业贸易网络中的对外直接投资决策同群效应分析[J]. 世界经济, 2022(10):58-83.

[5] 高培勇. 构建新发展格局: 在统筹发展和安全中前行[J]. 经济研究, 2021(3):4-13.

[6] 黄群慧. 新发展格局的理论逻辑、战略内涵与政策体系: 基于经济现代化的视角[J]. 经济研究, 2021(4):4-23.

[7] 吴群锋, 杨汝岱. 网络与贸易: 一个扩展引力模型研究框架[J]. 经济研究, 2019(2):84-101.

[8] 潘镇. 制度质量、制度距离与双边贸易[J]. 中国工业经济, 2006(7):45-52.

[9] 俞路. 语言文化对“一带一路”沿线各国双边贸易的影响: 基于扩展引力模型的实证研究[J]. 世界地理研究, 2017(5):21-31.

[10] 杨曦, 杨宇舟. 全球价值链下的区域贸易协定: 效应模拟与机制分析[J]. 世界经济, 2022(5):29-56.

[11] 马佳卉, 贺灿飞. 中间产品贸易网络结构及其演化的影响因素探究: 基于贸易成本视角[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019(10):1607-1620.

[12] Chaney T. The network structure of international trade[J]. The American Economic Review, 2014, 104(11):3600-3634.

[13] 刘林青, 闫小斐, 杨理斯, 等. 国际贸易依赖网络的演化及内生机制研究[J]. 中国工业经济, 2021(2):98-116.

[14] 李敬, 刘洋. 中国国民经济循环: 结构与区域网络关系透视[J]. 经济研究, 2022(2):27-42.

[15] Grossman G.M, Helpman E. Trade, knowledge spillovers, and growth[J]. European Economic Review, 1991, 35:517-526.

[16] 许和连, 孙天阳, 成丽红. “一带一路”高端制造业贸易格局及影响因素研究: 基于复杂网络的指数随机图分析[J]. 财贸经济, 2015(12):74-88.

[17] Yin M, Zhu L.J. Reciprocity in directed networks[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2016, 447:71-84.

[18] Emerson R.M. Power-dependence relations[J]. American Sociological Review, 1962, 27(1):31-41.

[19] 包群, 但佳丽. 网络地位、共享商业关系与大客户占比[J]. 经济研究, 2021(10):189-205.

[20] 侯传璐, 覃成林. 中国省际贸易网络的特征及影响因素: 基于铁路货运流量数据及指数随机图模型的分析[J]. 财贸经济, 2019(3):116-129.

[21] Barabasi A.L, Albert R. Emergence of scaling in random networks[J]. Science, 1999, 286(5439):509-512.

[22] 刘林青, 陈紫若, 田毕飞. 结构依赖如何影响贸易网络形成及演化: 以“一带一路”为例[J]. 世界经济研究, 2020(6):106-120.

[23] 唐晓彬, 崔茂生. “一带一路”货物贸易网络结构动态变化及其影响机制[J]. 财经研究, 2020(7):138-153.

[24] Lusher D, Koskinen J, Robins G. Exponential random graph models for social networks: theory, methods and applications[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012:9-15.

[25] Fowler J.H. Connecting the congress: a study of cosponsorship networks[J]. Political Analysis, 2006, 14(4):456-487.

[26] 袁志刚, 饶璨. 全球化与中国生产服务业发展: 基于全球投入产出模型的研究[J]. 管理世界, 2014(3):10-30.

[27] Kali R, Reyes J. Financial contagion on the international trade network[J]. Economic Inquiry, 2010, 48(4):1072-1101.

[28] Lall S. The technological structure and performance of developing country manufactured exports, 1985–1998[J]. Oxford Development Studies, 2000, 28(3):337-369.

Downloads

Published

2025-02-22

How to Cite

Endogenous Mechanism of Global Production Network Evolution and China’s Role. (2025). Modern Economic Science, 47(1), 60-73. https://doi.org/10.20069/m0xks380

Similar Articles

11-20 of 55

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.