Equalization Transfer Payment of Social Security: Logical Interpretation, Institutional Construction and Effect Evaluation

Authors

  • ZHANG Zongliang School of Insurance, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing 102206, China
  • CHU Fuling School of Insurance, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing 102206, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20069/zkmzxy13

Keywords:

social security expenditure, equalization of basic public services, transfer payment, standard fiscal revenue and expenditure, expenditure cost difference

Abstract

The construction of China’s social security system relies on the involvement of government functions and the sharing of financial responsibilities. Social security expenditure, as one of the necessary means, needs to meet the demand for public service-oriented finances in ensuring people’s livelihoods while also evaluating the government’s expenditure pressure under limited financial capacity. Therefore, achieving equalization of basic social security becomes a necessary choice, while constructing a scientifically standardized system of equalization transfer payment standards and scheme models becomes crucial.

This paper focuses on the equalization of basic social security across regions, addressing the disparities in regional social security financing and the practical issues of transfer payments. It proposes a logical framework, standard system, and measurement model for equalized social security transfer payments. Furthermore, the paper utilizes provincial fiscal data from China spanning 2011 to 2020 to calculate the funding gaps in social security and evaluate the effects of transfer payment equalization. The research posits that the imbalance in social security revenue and expenditure constitutes an intrinsic motivation for central government transfer payments to localities, yielding several new findings: 1) Social security transfer payments are not merely simple financial transfers, because in reality, there is no strict correspondence between the gap in social security revenue and expenditure among provinces and their respective levels of economic development and fiscal revenue capacity; 2) In comparison to equalization standards, the actual amounts of social security transfer payments nationwide have received substantial support from central fiscal resources, which starkly contrasts with previous concerns regarding local social security financing; 3) The current redistribution tendencies of social security transfer payment strategies are insufficient, exacerbating imbalances in social security expenditure levels and capacities both within and between regions.

Based on these findings, the paper argues that addressing distributional issues, rather than solely focusing on fiscal capacity, should be the core task of equal transfer payments for social security. Future institutional development should adhere to the theoretical origins of fiscal transfer payments and the unique characteristics of China’s social security system while innovating various supporting mechanisms in law, finance, evaluation, and management. Compared to existing literature, the potential marginal contributions of this article are as follows: 1) It explores social security expenditures, emphasizing the institutional relationship between social security and public finance, and elaborates on the inherent logic and conditional basis of equalization transfer payments in social security. This provides theoretical guidance for the future refinement of related schemes based on different social security systems; 2) It enhances the standard system and measurement model for equalization transfer payments in social security, focusing on the scientific calculation of core indicators such as fiscal revenue and expenditure associated with social security standards and actual amounts of transfer payments under limited data conditions, while proposing feasible schemes for regular monitoring; 3) It addresses shortcomings in prior research related to inconsistent statistical criteria and insufficient detail in revenue and expenditure categories, updating a substantial amount of foundational data to present an overview of social security expenditures and their transfer payment effects, thereby providing reliable empirical evidence for relevant system development.

While the calculations may still have limitations due to constraints related to practical experience, data availability, and model specifications, the results maintain overall explanatory power based on rigorous justification of statistical criteria, model specifications, parameter substitutions, and indicator estimations. Notably, the proposed equalization scheme and its preliminary validation provide a comprehensive framework and detailed direction for accurately assessing the equalization effects of social security transfer payments in the future.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] 吕承超, 白春玲. 中国社会保障发展空间差距及随机收敛研究[J]. 财政研究, 2016(4):47-59.

[2] 金辉, 李春根. 中国社会保障财政支出的区域差异特征[J]. 经济地理, 2023(1):64-71.

[3] 刘灵辉, 张迎新, 傅鑫艺. 从分权看发展: “省直管县”改革如何促进县域经济增长[J]. 当代经济科学, 2023(2):58-72.

[4] 宋佳莹, 高传胜. 社会保障质量与经济高质量发展协调性研究: 脱钩与耦合视角[J]. 西安交通大学学报(社会科学版), 2024(2):132-146.

[5] 方元子. 政府间转移支付与区域基本公共服务均等化[M]. 北京: 经济科学出版社, 2017:13.

[6] 曾红颖. 我国基本公共服务均等化标准体系及转移支付效果评价[J]. 经济研究, 2012(6):20-32.

[7] 贾晓俊, 岳希明. 我国不同形式转移支付财力均等化效应研究[J]. 经济理论与经济管理, 2015(1):44-54.

[8] 储德银, 邵娇. 财政纵向失衡与公共支出结构偏向: 理论机制诠释与中国经验证据[J]. 财政研究, 2018(4):20-32.

[9] 郝春虹, 王英家, 贾晓俊, 等. 分好“财政蛋糕”: 对转移支付财力均等化效应和效率的考察[J]. 中国工业经济, 2021(12):31-49.

[10] 焦长权, 王伟进. 迈向共同富裕的财政再分配: 政府间转移支付的动态效应与制度逻辑[J]. 社会学研究, 2023(1):22-44.

[11] 贾晓俊, 岳希明. 我国均衡性转移支付资金分配机制研究[J]. 经济研究, 2012(1):17-30.

[12] 杨得前, 刘仁济. 中央财政转移支付政策变迁的注意力分配及其逻辑阐释[J]. 财政研究, 2022(11):74-91.

[13] 马骏. 中央向地方的财政转移支付: 一个均等化公式和模拟结果[J]. 经济研究, 1997(3):11-20.

[14] 柯卉兵. 中国社会保障转移支付制度研究[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2014:168.

[15] 李宏, 张向达. 中国财政社会保障支出扩面效应的测算与比较[J]. 经济学家, 2020(4):68-79.

[16] 丛树海. 共同富裕目标下社会保障分配的财政定位: 基于“公平公正共享”理念的社会保障制度建设[J]. 社会保障评论, 2022(5):3-15.

[17] 胡斌, 毛艳华. 转移支付改革对基本公共服务均等化的影响[J]. 经济学家, 2018(3):63-72.

[18] 缪小林, 张蓉. 从分配迈向治理: 均衡性转移支付与基本公共服务均等化感知[J]. 管理世界, 2022(2):129-149.

[19] 储德银, 费冒盛, 李悦. 均衡性转移支付、公共支出结构与经济高质量发展[J]. 经济理论与经济管理, 2020(9):20-35.

[20] 孙文杰, 薛幸. 财政支出、空间溢出效应与城乡收入差距演变[J]. 当代经济科学, 2016(2):69-78.

[21] Grand J.L. Fiscal equity and central government grants to local authorities[J]. Economic Journal, 1975, 85(339):531-547.

[22] McMillan M.L. Rethinking fiscal equalisation for local governments[M]. Canberra: Australian National University, Centre for Research on Federal Financial Relations, 1981:13-54.

[23] Shah A. A fiscal need approach to equalization[J]. Canadian Public Policy / Analyse de Politiques, 1996, 22(2):99-115.

[24] Shah A, Boadway R, Spahn P.B, et al. Intergovernmental fiscal transfers: principles and practice[M]. Washington: The World Bank, 2006:453-538.

[25] 马桑. 省际社会保障财政支出与经济实力非一致性影响因素研究: 来自模糊集定性比较分析的解释[J]. 保险研究, 2020(9):117-127.

Downloads

Published

2025-03-28

How to Cite

Equalization Transfer Payment of Social Security: Logical Interpretation, Institutional Construction and Effect Evaluation. (2025). Modern Economic Science, 47(2), 19-40. https://doi.org/10.20069/zkmzxy13

Similar Articles

1-10 of 49

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.